In our comparison of Front vs. SugarCRM, SugarCRM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
I highly recommend this platform for its effectiveness in streamlining communication and facilitating information sharing. Just be mindful of maintaining boundaries with regard to off-hour communications to prevent potential disruptions.
Keeps everyone informed without the need for constant email forwarding. The ability to seamlessly share conversations with those who require the information is crucial for efficient collaboration.
I have noticed that due to its accessibility across multiple platforms, I sometimes find myself checking it during off-hours.
General Comments: The big companies will find it very beneficial.
Listing all my employees on my business page is easy with it.
Email viewing is not attractive.
If you're someone who relies heavily on email communication, I would definitely recommend this software as it can save you time and streamline your inbox.
One of the things I loved most about the software was the ability to manage multiple email accounts from one place. As a business owner who communicates primarily via email, having all my emails in one place was incredibly convenient. The ability to tag emails for other users was also a huge plus.
On the downside, I did find the software to be quite pricey, especially for small businesses. However, if you have the budget for it, I think it's definitely worth the investment.
I have worked with Sugar CRM and created numerous add-ons for consulting projects.
Flexible, a nice development model if you personally want to host the CRM, almost all can be extended in PHP, the cost is lower compared to Salesforce.
A dated UI, tabs are poorly displayed.
I highly recommend this platform for its effectiveness in streamlining communication and facilitating information sharing. Just be mindful of maintaining boundaries with regard to off-hour communications to prevent potential disruptions.
Keeps everyone informed without the need for constant email forwarding. The ability to seamlessly share conversations with those who require the information is crucial for efficient collaboration.
I have noticed that due to its accessibility across multiple platforms, I sometimes find myself checking it during off-hours.
If you're someone who relies heavily on email communication, I would definitely recommend this software as it can save you time and streamline your inbox.
One of the things I loved most about the software was the ability to manage multiple email accounts from one place. As a business owner who communicates primarily via email, having all my emails in one place was incredibly convenient. The ability to tag emails for other users was also a huge plus.
On the downside, I did find the software to be quite pricey, especially for small businesses. However, if you have the budget for it, I think it's definitely worth the investment.
General Comments: The big companies will find it very beneficial.
Listing all my employees on my business page is easy with it.
Email viewing is not attractive.
I have worked with Sugar CRM and created numerous add-ons for consulting projects.
Flexible, a nice development model if you personally want to host the CRM, almost all can be extended in PHP, the cost is lower compared to Salesforce.
A dated UI, tabs are poorly displayed.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Front vs. SugarCRM, Front has 17 user reviews and SugarCRM has 39. The average star rating for Front is 4.58 while SugarCRM has an average rating of 4.07. Front has more positive reviews than SugarCRM. Comparing Front vs. SugarCRM reviews, Front has stronger overall reviews.
Front vs. SugarCRM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Lead Management, Campaign Management, Helpdesk Features, Supported Channels, Campaign Types, Accounting Features, Reporting & Analytics, Customizable Items, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Limits, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of Front vs. SugarCRM, SugarCRM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Front.
In our pricing comparison of Front vs. SugarCRM, Front's pricing starts at $19/month and is more affordable compared to SugarCRM's starting cost of $49/month.
Our comparison of Front vs. SugarCRM shows that SugarCRM scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support. Front scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, ease of admin, but SugarCRM has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
