In our comparison of OneSpan Sign vs. Qwilr, OneSpan Sign is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
N/A
Its digital signing process streamlines the entire process, leading to faster turnaround times and an enhanced customer experience overall. This has significantly benefited our organization by improving efficiency and customer satisfaction.
Very easy to use & OneSpan's customer-oriented approach is commendable as they prioritize their customers' success with their product.
Qwilr effectively solves the problem of quotes becoming stagnant and losing momentum. With the ability to track when quotes have been viewed, we can proactively follow up with customers when necessary. This feature allows us to identify opportunities for additional touch points with our customers, ensuring that our quotes stay relevant and compelling. It has been a valuable asset in maintaining engagement with potential clients and ultimately driving more successful sales conversions.
As a technology services company, we emphasize the importance of partnership from the first interaction with our brand online to the closing sales meeting. Qwilr enables us to extend that narrative seamlessly into the agreement phase, which adds significant value to our business.
I'm not particularly fond of is the feature limitations in the product, especially concerning branding.
It fulfills the need for an easy-to-use Sign solution, benefiting us and our members.
What I love most about OneSpan Sign is how incredibly user-friendly it is. I was able to learn and use it within a matter of days, even without any prior experience in such tools.
Problem with sharing the user templates
The adaptable design and easily navigable templates of Qwilr facilitate the creation of polished proposals on all platforms. Although the program's features might restrict design freedom, Qwilr is a useful tool for expediting proposal preparation and delivery due to its frequent upgrades and attentive support.
Templates are good and easy to edit
Designs are limited
Its digital signing process streamlines the entire process, leading to faster turnaround times and an enhanced customer experience overall. This has significantly benefited our organization by improving efficiency and customer satisfaction.
Very easy to use & OneSpan's customer-oriented approach is commendable as they prioritize their customers' success with their product.
It fulfills the need for an easy-to-use Sign solution, benefiting us and our members.
What I love most about OneSpan Sign is how incredibly user-friendly it is. I was able to learn and use it within a matter of days, even without any prior experience in such tools.
Problem with sharing the user templates
Qwilr effectively solves the problem of quotes becoming stagnant and losing momentum. With the ability to track when quotes have been viewed, we can proactively follow up with customers when necessary. This feature allows us to identify opportunities for additional touch points with our customers, ensuring that our quotes stay relevant and compelling. It has been a valuable asset in maintaining engagement with potential clients and ultimately driving more successful sales conversions.
As a technology services company, we emphasize the importance of partnership from the first interaction with our brand online to the closing sales meeting. Qwilr enables us to extend that narrative seamlessly into the agreement phase, which adds significant value to our business.
I'm not particularly fond of is the feature limitations in the product, especially concerning branding.
The adaptable design and easily navigable templates of Qwilr facilitate the creation of polished proposals on all platforms. Although the program's features might restrict design freedom, Qwilr is a useful tool for expediting proposal preparation and delivery due to its frequent upgrades and attentive support.
Templates are good and easy to edit
Designs are limited
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of OneSpan Sign vs. Qwilr, Qwilr has 26 user reviews and OneSpan Sign has 30. The average star rating for Qwilr is 4.69 while OneSpan Sign has an average rating of 4.46. Qwilr has more positive reviews than OneSpan Sign. Comparing OneSpan Sign vs. Qwilr reviews, Qwilr has stronger overall reviews.
OneSpan Sign vs. Qwilr both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Signature Management, Signature Types, File Management, Supported File Formats, Data Management, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Customizable Items, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of OneSpan Sign vs. Qwilr, OneSpan Sign offers more of the most popular features and tools than Qwilr.
In our pricing comparison of OneSpan Sign vs. Qwilr, Qwilr's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Qwilr's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of OneSpan Sign vs. Qwilr shows that OneSpan Sign scores higher in usability for meets requirements, setup & support. Qwilr scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin, but OneSpan Sign has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
