In our comparison of eClinicalWorks vs. iPatientCare, eClinicalWorks is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
It is adaptable, dependable, using it is simple, it has additional features, and client support is good
Very expensive.
ADP RUN is helpful and cost-effective, it’s a time saver, it functions as anticipated almost every time without any downtime, the client service team is extremely great as is incorporation with other hiring services, it’s powerful and it provides many diverse and helpful aspects.
It eases the payroll, offers our employees with a simple to use timecard and data portal that lets them view their pay stubs, hiring balances, and W-2s, hardly do you find mistakes in the system, has a very responsive and helpful client support team, W-2 forms are created automatically for us to mail out, ADP assists us to file taxes and employment reports thereby saving us plenty of time, RUN incorporates with ADP’s hiring services division enabling staff make alterations to their deferral percentages and investment choices directly via the Employee Access Hub. Finally, the HR411 aspect is helpful for fundamental HR questions more so when particular forms are required.
The Employee Access Hub frequently bugs and hinders a few staff from accessing their accounts, ADP has a tendency of having random sales staff reach out from time to time to try upsells instead of a committed account administrator.
By the time of going live, plenty of installation work remained forcing us to postpone the process by two months. After going live and using it for one year, most of our patients leave as it is full of bugs. Overall, the experience of patients has become very confusing and horrible. It is full of incorrect reminders and its portal is glitched. Investing in this software will cost you your money and patients.
It has many useful features, and if everything really functioned well, it would be extremely simple and customizable to use.
Terrible support-extremely slow response. Bugs are all over the software and very minimal processes (if any) were thought through.
It links numerous places of healthcare and offered the range of assistance for the organization.
Since the product is heavily relied upon, it becomes a mechanical use of the software.
It is adaptable, dependable, using it is simple, it has additional features, and client support is good
Very expensive.
By the time of going live, plenty of installation work remained forcing us to postpone the process by two months. After going live and using it for one year, most of our patients leave as it is full of bugs. Overall, the experience of patients has become very confusing and horrible. It is full of incorrect reminders and its portal is glitched. Investing in this software will cost you your money and patients.
It has many useful features, and if everything really functioned well, it would be extremely simple and customizable to use.
Terrible support-extremely slow response. Bugs are all over the software and very minimal processes (if any) were thought through.
ADP RUN is helpful and cost-effective, it’s a time saver, it functions as anticipated almost every time without any downtime, the client service team is extremely great as is incorporation with other hiring services, it’s powerful and it provides many diverse and helpful aspects.
It eases the payroll, offers our employees with a simple to use timecard and data portal that lets them view their pay stubs, hiring balances, and W-2s, hardly do you find mistakes in the system, has a very responsive and helpful client support team, W-2 forms are created automatically for us to mail out, ADP assists us to file taxes and employment reports thereby saving us plenty of time, RUN incorporates with ADP’s hiring services division enabling staff make alterations to their deferral percentages and investment choices directly via the Employee Access Hub. Finally, the HR411 aspect is helpful for fundamental HR questions more so when particular forms are required.
The Employee Access Hub frequently bugs and hinders a few staff from accessing their accounts, ADP has a tendency of having random sales staff reach out from time to time to try upsells instead of a committed account administrator.
It links numerous places of healthcare and offered the range of assistance for the organization.
Since the product is heavily relied upon, it becomes a mechanical use of the software.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of eClinicalWorks vs. iPatientCare, iPatientCare has 2 user reviews and eClinicalWorks has 69. The average star rating for iPatientCare is 5 while eClinicalWorks has an average rating of 3.40. iPatientCare has more positive reviews than eClinicalWorks. Comparing eClinicalWorks vs. iPatientCare reviews, iPatientCare has stronger overall reviews.
eClinicalWorks vs. iPatientCare both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Language & Speech, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Reporting & Analytics, Sync/Refresh, Disaster Recovery, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of eClinicalWorks vs. iPatientCare, eClinicalWorks offers more of the most popular features and tools than iPatientCare.
In our pricing comparison of eClinicalWorks vs. iPatientCare, iPatientCare's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to iPatientCare's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of eClinicalWorks vs. iPatientCare shows that eClinicalWorks scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. iPatientCare scores higher in ease of use, but eClinicalWorks has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.