In our comparison of Qwilr vs. Zoho Sign, Zoho Sign is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
N/A
Qwilr effectively solves the problem of quotes becoming stagnant and losing momentum. With the ability to track when quotes have been viewed, we can proactively follow up with customers when necessary. This feature allows us to identify opportunities for additional touch points with our customers, ensuring that our quotes stay relevant and compelling. It has been a valuable asset in maintaining engagement with potential clients and ultimately driving more successful sales conversions.
As a technology services company, we emphasize the importance of partnership from the first interaction with our brand online to the closing sales meeting. Qwilr enables us to extend that narrative seamlessly into the agreement phase, which adds significant value to our business.
I'm not particularly fond of is the feature limitations in the product, especially concerning branding.
Our organization switched to Zoho Sign after facing high costs with Docusign, the pioneers in the industry. Zoho Sign allows efficient organization of contracts and legal documents across departments, with features like progress tracking, signature receipts, and auto-reminders. The self-sign feature is particularly useful for generic documents that require signatures from employees or contractors. However, occasional bugs arise when sending multi-signatory documents, affecting the user details entry and hindering progress in the back end.
Comprehensive coverage of features. Efficient organization of contracts and legal documents. Self-sign feature for generic document signing.
Occasional bugs when sending multi-signatory documents, affecting user details entry in the back end.
The adaptable design and easily navigable templates of Qwilr facilitate the creation of polished proposals on all platforms. Although the program's features might restrict design freedom, Qwilr is a useful tool for expediting proposal preparation and delivery due to its frequent upgrades and attentive support.
Templates are good and easy to edit
Designs are limited
For my company, Zoho Sign has been a complete game-changer, simplifying administrative duties and giving customers a safe and easy document signing experience. The easily navigable UI, adaptable features, and seamless interaction with further Zoho applications have enhanced the professional image of my organization. The electronic signature's general functioning has proven beneficial, even though it might not entirely comply with Mexican legal standards.
Simplified administrative duties, safe and easy document signing experience for customers, easily navigable UI and adaptable features
Electronic signature may not entirely comply with Mexican legal standards
Qwilr effectively solves the problem of quotes becoming stagnant and losing momentum. With the ability to track when quotes have been viewed, we can proactively follow up with customers when necessary. This feature allows us to identify opportunities for additional touch points with our customers, ensuring that our quotes stay relevant and compelling. It has been a valuable asset in maintaining engagement with potential clients and ultimately driving more successful sales conversions.
As a technology services company, we emphasize the importance of partnership from the first interaction with our brand online to the closing sales meeting. Qwilr enables us to extend that narrative seamlessly into the agreement phase, which adds significant value to our business.
I'm not particularly fond of is the feature limitations in the product, especially concerning branding.
The adaptable design and easily navigable templates of Qwilr facilitate the creation of polished proposals on all platforms. Although the program's features might restrict design freedom, Qwilr is a useful tool for expediting proposal preparation and delivery due to its frequent upgrades and attentive support.
Templates are good and easy to edit
Designs are limited
Our organization switched to Zoho Sign after facing high costs with Docusign, the pioneers in the industry. Zoho Sign allows efficient organization of contracts and legal documents across departments, with features like progress tracking, signature receipts, and auto-reminders. The self-sign feature is particularly useful for generic documents that require signatures from employees or contractors. However, occasional bugs arise when sending multi-signatory documents, affecting the user details entry and hindering progress in the back end.
Comprehensive coverage of features. Efficient organization of contracts and legal documents. Self-sign feature for generic document signing.
Occasional bugs when sending multi-signatory documents, affecting user details entry in the back end.
For my company, Zoho Sign has been a complete game-changer, simplifying administrative duties and giving customers a safe and easy document signing experience. The easily navigable UI, adaptable features, and seamless interaction with further Zoho applications have enhanced the professional image of my organization. The electronic signature's general functioning has proven beneficial, even though it might not entirely comply with Mexican legal standards.
Simplified administrative duties, safe and easy document signing experience for customers, easily navigable UI and adaptable features
Electronic signature may not entirely comply with Mexican legal standards
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Qwilr vs. Zoho Sign, Qwilr has 26 user reviews and Zoho Sign has 31. The average star rating for Qwilr is 4.69 while Zoho Sign has an average rating of 4.16. Qwilr has more positive reviews than Zoho Sign. Comparing Qwilr vs. Zoho Sign reviews, Qwilr has stronger overall reviews.
Qwilr vs. Zoho Sign both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Signature Management, Signature Types, File Management, Supported File Formats, Data Migration, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Customizable Items, Workflow Automation, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Zoho, Compliance Accreditations, Limits, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Qwilr vs. Zoho Sign, Zoho Sign offers more of the most popular features and tools than Qwilr.
In our pricing comparison of Qwilr vs. Zoho Sign, Zoho Sign's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Zoho Sign's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Qwilr vs. Zoho Sign shows that Zoho Sign scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support. Qwilr scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin, but Zoho Sign has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
