In our comparison of M-Files vs. Nuxeo, M-Files is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
File accessibility through your computers main software, a web browser or mobile app is possible using this software. The way of working on documents are changing and becoming more effective using the aid of digital workflows. Documents can hardly get lost, stolen, or unauthorized access trials as you can get security for your private or company files using M-Files.
Using it is simple, the interface looks modest, perfectly functioning collaboration with MS Office apps, when added to the software, add-ons for M-Files are functioning well, workflows are customizable, M-Files functions on disparate platforms, and through M-Files, you can save and share documents.
An extremely tedious process of locating documents or files-to get the right search outcomes, you have to use the right keyword.
We are currently in the process of evaluating and configuring the ECM application, which promises to enhance our document management and workflow processes.
I appreciate the mobile-oriented design of the Nuxeo platform, which makes it accessible on various devices.
There is room for improvement in image indexing.
I cannot regret using M-files as it is affordable and it the best when it comes to organizing and saving office documents.
Implementing and working with M-Files is simple, it is an extremely quick software, searching for documents is simple, it is an essential software for any office as it is incredibly secure, and it provides a simple method to maintain organization of items and in the correct place in the office.
Extremely terrible client support.
We are successfully tackling content management tasks with this system, leveraging its robust architectural design and data source versatility.
The architecture, specifically OSGI, is well-designed. Flexibility is provided for utilizing various data sources, enhancing adaptability.
Dependencies can be a bit restrictive, warranting more flexibility and options. Documentation could benefit from improvement, especially in clarifying certain aspects.
File accessibility through your computers main software, a web browser or mobile app is possible using this software. The way of working on documents are changing and becoming more effective using the aid of digital workflows. Documents can hardly get lost, stolen, or unauthorized access trials as you can get security for your private or company files using M-Files.
Using it is simple, the interface looks modest, perfectly functioning collaboration with MS Office apps, when added to the software, add-ons for M-Files are functioning well, workflows are customizable, M-Files functions on disparate platforms, and through M-Files, you can save and share documents.
An extremely tedious process of locating documents or files-to get the right search outcomes, you have to use the right keyword.
I cannot regret using M-files as it is affordable and it the best when it comes to organizing and saving office documents.
Implementing and working with M-Files is simple, it is an extremely quick software, searching for documents is simple, it is an essential software for any office as it is incredibly secure, and it provides a simple method to maintain organization of items and in the correct place in the office.
Extremely terrible client support.
We are currently in the process of evaluating and configuring the ECM application, which promises to enhance our document management and workflow processes.
I appreciate the mobile-oriented design of the Nuxeo platform, which makes it accessible on various devices.
There is room for improvement in image indexing.
We are successfully tackling content management tasks with this system, leveraging its robust architectural design and data source versatility.
The architecture, specifically OSGI, is well-designed. Flexibility is provided for utilizing various data sources, enhancing adaptability.
Dependencies can be a bit restrictive, warranting more flexibility and options. Documentation could benefit from improvement, especially in clarifying certain aspects.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of M-Files vs. Nuxeo, M-Files has 19 user reviews and Nuxeo has 12. The average star rating for M-Files is 4.42 while Nuxeo has an average rating of 4.25. M-Files has more positive reviews than Nuxeo. Comparing M-Files vs. Nuxeo reviews, M-Files has stronger overall reviews.
M-Files vs. Nuxeo both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Workflow Automation, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Adobe, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of M-Files vs. Nuxeo, M-Files offers more of the most popular features and tools than Nuxeo.
In our pricing comparison of M-Files vs. Nuxeo, Nuxeo's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Nuxeo's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of M-Files vs. Nuxeo shows that M-Files scores higher in usability for meets requirements, ease of admin. Nuxeo scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, but M-Files has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
