In our comparison of IntakeQ vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
I am extremely satisfied with this app.
I like IntakeQ because it is easy to use, secure receiving and sending information, HIPPA compliant, provide patient information like their insurance cards and ids. Excellent service.
It would be good if they added the incoming tax feature too. Forms can be made easier once you have learned how to make them. I would be glad if I received alerts not only when the patient completes the form but when they start filing them too.
It is adaptable, dependable, using it is simple, it has additional features, and client support is good
Very expensive.
The form meets all HIPPA requirements and they can be customized.
IntakeQ offered a solution to the several complaints regarding intake forms and their updating for upcoming evaluation.
None.
By the time of going live, plenty of installation work remained forcing us to postpone the process by two months. After going live and using it for one year, most of our patients leave as it is full of bugs. Overall, the experience of patients has become very confusing and horrible. It is full of incorrect reminders and its portal is glitched. Investing in this software will cost you your money and patients.
It has many useful features, and if everything really functioned well, it would be extremely simple and customizable to use.
Terrible support-extremely slow response. Bugs are all over the software and very minimal processes (if any) were thought through.
I am extremely satisfied with this app.
I like IntakeQ because it is easy to use, secure receiving and sending information, HIPPA compliant, provide patient information like their insurance cards and ids. Excellent service.
It would be good if they added the incoming tax feature too. Forms can be made easier once you have learned how to make them. I would be glad if I received alerts not only when the patient completes the form but when they start filing them too.
The form meets all HIPPA requirements and they can be customized.
IntakeQ offered a solution to the several complaints regarding intake forms and their updating for upcoming evaluation.
None.
It is adaptable, dependable, using it is simple, it has additional features, and client support is good
Very expensive.
By the time of going live, plenty of installation work remained forcing us to postpone the process by two months. After going live and using it for one year, most of our patients leave as it is full of bugs. Overall, the experience of patients has become very confusing and horrible. It is full of incorrect reminders and its portal is glitched. Investing in this software will cost you your money and patients.
It has many useful features, and if everything really functioned well, it would be extremely simple and customizable to use.
Terrible support-extremely slow response. Bugs are all over the software and very minimal processes (if any) were thought through.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of IntakeQ vs. eClinicalWorks, IntakeQ has 32 user reviews and eClinicalWorks has 69. The average star rating for IntakeQ is 4.84 while eClinicalWorks has an average rating of 3.40. IntakeQ has more positive reviews than eClinicalWorks. Comparing IntakeQ vs. eClinicalWorks reviews, IntakeQ has stronger overall reviews.
IntakeQ vs. eClinicalWorks both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Language & Speech, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Reporting & Analytics, Sync/Refresh, Disaster Recovery, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of IntakeQ vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks offers more of the most popular features and tools than IntakeQ.
In our pricing comparison of IntakeQ vs. eClinicalWorks, eClinicalWorks's pricing starts at $499/month and is more affordable compared to eClinicalWorks's starting cost of $499/month.
Our comparison of IntakeQ vs. eClinicalWorks shows that eClinicalWorks scores higher in usability for ease of use, quality of support, ease of admin. IntakeQ scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, but eClinicalWorks has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
