In our comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files, M-Files is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Concrete5 is a powerful yet user-friendly CMS that offers dynamic solutions for various projects. Its cost-efficient marketplace, robust e-commerce features, and quick deployment capabilities make it valuable for web development needs. While a learning curve exists, the platform's benefits far outweigh occasional challenges.
For those requiring multi-language displays, Concrete5 seamlessly handles internationalization, catering to a global audience. Sites can be swiftly deployed with minimal costs, and end-users often require only minutes, not hours or days, for training. The platform's user-friendly nature contributes to swift adoption.
The technology underpinning Concrete5 has evolved over the years, introducing increased complexity. However, this doesn't impede less technical users from utilizing the platform effectively.
File accessibility through your computers main software, a web browser or mobile app is possible using this software. The way of working on documents are changing and becoming more effective using the aid of digital workflows. Documents can hardly get lost, stolen, or unauthorized access trials as you can get security for your private or company files using M-Files.
Using it is simple, the interface looks modest, perfectly functioning collaboration with MS Office apps, when added to the software, add-ons for M-Files are functioning well, workflows are customizable, M-Files functions on disparate platforms, and through M-Files, you can save and share documents.
An extremely tedious process of locating documents or files-to get the right search outcomes, you have to use the right keyword.
This is a powerful system for web developers for developing a content management system without building a solution from the start or tricking a blog into a website.
Installation and having the system functioning takes some time.
I cannot regret using M-files as it is affordable and it the best when it comes to organizing and saving office documents.
Implementing and working with M-Files is simple, it is an extremely quick software, searching for documents is simple, it is an essential software for any office as it is incredibly secure, and it provides a simple method to maintain organization of items and in the correct place in the office.
Extremely terrible client support.
Concrete5 is a powerful yet user-friendly CMS that offers dynamic solutions for various projects. Its cost-efficient marketplace, robust e-commerce features, and quick deployment capabilities make it valuable for web development needs. While a learning curve exists, the platform's benefits far outweigh occasional challenges.
For those requiring multi-language displays, Concrete5 seamlessly handles internationalization, catering to a global audience. Sites can be swiftly deployed with minimal costs, and end-users often require only minutes, not hours or days, for training. The platform's user-friendly nature contributes to swift adoption.
The technology underpinning Concrete5 has evolved over the years, introducing increased complexity. However, this doesn't impede less technical users from utilizing the platform effectively.
This is a powerful system for web developers for developing a content management system without building a solution from the start or tricking a blog into a website.
Installation and having the system functioning takes some time.
File accessibility through your computers main software, a web browser or mobile app is possible using this software. The way of working on documents are changing and becoming more effective using the aid of digital workflows. Documents can hardly get lost, stolen, or unauthorized access trials as you can get security for your private or company files using M-Files.
Using it is simple, the interface looks modest, perfectly functioning collaboration with MS Office apps, when added to the software, add-ons for M-Files are functioning well, workflows are customizable, M-Files functions on disparate platforms, and through M-Files, you can save and share documents.
An extremely tedious process of locating documents or files-to get the right search outcomes, you have to use the right keyword.
I cannot regret using M-files as it is affordable and it the best when it comes to organizing and saving office documents.
Implementing and working with M-Files is simple, it is an extremely quick software, searching for documents is simple, it is an essential software for any office as it is incredibly secure, and it provides a simple method to maintain organization of items and in the correct place in the office.
Extremely terrible client support.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files, Concrete5 has 14 user reviews and M-Files has 19. The average star rating for Concrete5 is 4.64 while M-Files has an average rating of 4.42. Concrete5 has more positive reviews than M-Files. Comparing Concrete5 vs. M-Files reviews, Concrete5 has stronger overall reviews.
Concrete5 vs. M-Files both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management, File Management, Supported File Formats, Signature Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Collaboration Tools, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Workflow Automation, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Adobe, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files, M-Files offers more of the most popular features and tools than Concrete5.
In our pricing comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files, M-Files's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to M-Files's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Concrete5 vs. M-Files shows that M-Files scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin. Concrete5 scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but M-Files has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
