In our comparison of Blue Jeans vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The audio and video quality calls are incredibly effective, the naturally existing gap in communication between the offshore and full time designers has been eased by this software, and collaboration with the offshore group is possible courtesy of BlueJeans.
The bandwidth consumed by BlueJeans exceeds the normal consumption.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
When installing platforms and servers for our clients, we communicate with 30 of them (disparate) every month. Also, every day, we use it with our infrastructure team.
Smooth presentations, exceptional quality of audio and video,
Extremely slow and inaccurate remote control, the platform at times requests you to setup the software making people get puzzled yet the web interface is quite faulty.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
The audio and video quality calls are incredibly effective, the naturally existing gap in communication between the offshore and full time designers has been eased by this software, and collaboration with the offshore group is possible courtesy of BlueJeans.
The bandwidth consumed by BlueJeans exceeds the normal consumption.
When installing platforms and servers for our clients, we communicate with 30 of them (disparate) every month. Also, every day, we use it with our infrastructure team.
Smooth presentations, exceptional quality of audio and video,
Extremely slow and inaccurate remote control, the platform at times requests you to setup the software making people get puzzled yet the web interface is quite faulty.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
Solves the crucial problems of maintaining communication during lockdown and facilitating smooth collaboration on projects. It has greatly benefited me in staying connected with my team and ensuring efficient teamwork.
Easy-to-use interface. It makes it effortless for me to stay connected with colleagues and collaborate effectively.
one thing I dislike is that it is not widely used across organizations. Many organizations, including mine, have transitioned to a different software called Teams, which, in my opinion, is not as user-friendly.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Blue Jeans vs. MiTeam Meetings, Blue Jeans has 37 user reviews and MiTeam Meetings has 15. The average star rating for Blue Jeans is 4.35 while MiTeam Meetings has an average rating of 4.2. Blue Jeans has more positive reviews than MiTeam Meetings. Comparing Blue Jeans vs. MiTeam Meetings reviews, Blue Jeans has stronger overall reviews.
Blue Jeans vs. MiTeam Meetings both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Presenter Controls, Remote Support Features, Chat/IM Management, Phone System Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Language & Speech, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Blue Jeans vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than Blue Jeans.
In our pricing comparison of Blue Jeans vs. MiTeam Meetings, MiTeam Meetings's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to MiTeam Meetings's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Blue Jeans vs. MiTeam Meetings shows that MiTeam Meetings scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin. Blue Jeans scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but MiTeam Meetings has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
