In our comparison of SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs. Workable, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Its user-friendly interface and various customization options make it a valuable asset for any organization.
Whether it's posting jobs for external or internal candidates, the process is incredibly straightforward. The option to control the visibility of job postings, whether public or private, adds a fantastic level of flexibility.
None
The support is good, using it is simple, and centralized storage of hiring details.
The Pro version locked up most of the major features we required.
It has brought efficiency and structure to these essential aspects of our operations.
This solution provides a comprehensive platform for managing performance management and salary review efficiently.
There are instances where the platform is not as user-friendly as one would hope. Occasional mistakes can occur, which can be a source of frustration.
Workable can be among the most commended ATS to use if its filtering function is enhanced.
Intuitive to use, simple to set up, user-friendly interface, simple to navigate.
Non effective search function, and difficult to filter via thousands of candidates due to the poor search functions.
Its user-friendly interface and various customization options make it a valuable asset for any organization.
Whether it's posting jobs for external or internal candidates, the process is incredibly straightforward. The option to control the visibility of job postings, whether public or private, adds a fantastic level of flexibility.
None
It has brought efficiency and structure to these essential aspects of our operations.
This solution provides a comprehensive platform for managing performance management and salary review efficiently.
There are instances where the platform is not as user-friendly as one would hope. Occasional mistakes can occur, which can be a source of frustration.
The support is good, using it is simple, and centralized storage of hiring details.
The Pro version locked up most of the major features we required.
Workable can be among the most commended ATS to use if its filtering function is enhanced.
Intuitive to use, simple to set up, user-friendly interface, simple to navigate.
Non effective search function, and difficult to filter via thousands of candidates due to the poor search functions.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs. Workable, Workable has 82 user reviews and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 13. The average star rating for Workable is 4.45 while SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has an average rating of 4. Workable has more positive reviews than SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting. Comparing SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs. Workable reviews, Workable has stronger overall reviews.
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs. Workable both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Reporting & Analytics, Supported Channels, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs. Workable, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting offers more of the most popular features and tools than Workable.
In our pricing comparison of SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs. Workable, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting's pricing starts at $3/month and is more affordable compared to Workable's starting cost of $149/month.
Our comparison of SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs. Workable shows that SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin. Workable scores higher in learning curve, quality of support, but SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
