In our comparison of ProWorkflow vs. Targetprocess, ProWorkflow is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Great client service and overall experience
Project administration and keeping track of our staffs time budgets are examples of assistance we get from this software
Installing different permissions per staff is not possible.
We’re able to monitor the mistakes viewed on our websites and pages using TargetProcess.
The update is fairly irregular.
Using it is extremely simple, it has pleasant and exceptional graphics for all users, a very quick and organized manner to move cards regarding our work procedures, and using Target Process, we’re able to easily create, edit and allocate cards.
ProWorkflow setup is intuitive, simple to bring users onboard, enables admins build business templates easily, can be implemented easily across all channels and can be operated even by people without great technical skills.
Use of email led to delayed customer response due to different time zones between us and N. America.
All our business requirements are supported by TP while practicing a few agile methodologies in our tasks. Its blog is amazing and plays a great role in helping new staff learn the onboard process.
System downtime is extremely rare, its blogs are helpful, the “follow” option on products in TP is good, has adaptable licensing which makes it simple to add/remove team members, the systems DSL used in filters and search is nice, my adaptability with user administration as an admin is great, and it has a natural UI despite being extremely complex.
It is pricey, picking up and installing some reports, graphs, and dashboards is extremely difficult, it is at times slow to paste pictures to descriptions, descriptions on products are sometimes unsteady, and a few incorporations that other systems support is lacking
Great client service and overall experience
Project administration and keeping track of our staffs time budgets are examples of assistance we get from this software
Installing different permissions per staff is not possible.
ProWorkflow setup is intuitive, simple to bring users onboard, enables admins build business templates easily, can be implemented easily across all channels and can be operated even by people without great technical skills.
Use of email led to delayed customer response due to different time zones between us and N. America.
We’re able to monitor the mistakes viewed on our websites and pages using TargetProcess.
The update is fairly irregular.
Using it is extremely simple, it has pleasant and exceptional graphics for all users, a very quick and organized manner to move cards regarding our work procedures, and using Target Process, we’re able to easily create, edit and allocate cards.
All our business requirements are supported by TP while practicing a few agile methodologies in our tasks. Its blog is amazing and plays a great role in helping new staff learn the onboard process.
System downtime is extremely rare, its blogs are helpful, the “follow” option on products in TP is good, has adaptable licensing which makes it simple to add/remove team members, the systems DSL used in filters and search is nice, my adaptability with user administration as an admin is great, and it has a natural UI despite being extremely complex.
It is pricey, picking up and installing some reports, graphs, and dashboards is extremely difficult, it is at times slow to paste pictures to descriptions, descriptions on products are sometimes unsteady, and a few incorporations that other systems support is lacking
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ProWorkflow vs. Targetprocess, Targetprocess has 135 user reviews and ProWorkflow has 65. The average star rating for Targetprocess is 4.58 while ProWorkflow has an average rating of 4.50. Targetprocess has more positive reviews than ProWorkflow. Comparing ProWorkflow vs. Targetprocess reviews, Targetprocess has stronger overall reviews.
ProWorkflow vs. Targetprocess both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Project Management Features, Task Management, Help Desk Features, Customizable Items, Portal Types, Attendance Management, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Supported File Formats, Chat/IM Management, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Workflow Automation, Layout Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, Accounting Features, After-Sales Service, Limits, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of ProWorkflow vs. Targetprocess, ProWorkflow offers more of the most popular features and tools than Targetprocess.
In our pricing comparison of ProWorkflow vs. Targetprocess, Targetprocess's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Targetprocess's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of ProWorkflow vs. Targetprocess shows that ProWorkflow scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support. Targetprocess scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin, but ProWorkflow has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
