In our comparison of Mimecast vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Once the system is mastered, administering Mimecast becomes straightforward. Its strong feature set and reliable protection significantly contribute to our email security strategy.
The user interface is intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate and interact with.
The sales experience left much to be desired, ranking among the worst I've encountered.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
This product is nothing short of amazing. Its versatility is impressive, allowing for highly customized impersonation protection policies. It goes the extra mile to ensure even newsletter spam doesn't infiltrate your mailbox.
Great tool in fortifying our email communications against spam, phishing attempts, and malware threats.
The external customer domains list has been a recurring source of issues for us.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
Once the system is mastered, administering Mimecast becomes straightforward. Its strong feature set and reliable protection significantly contribute to our email security strategy.
The user interface is intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate and interact with.
The sales experience left much to be desired, ranking among the worst I've encountered.
This product is nothing short of amazing. Its versatility is impressive, allowing for highly customized impersonation protection policies. It goes the extra mile to ensure even newsletter spam doesn't infiltrate your mailbox.
Great tool in fortifying our email communications against spam, phishing attempts, and malware threats.
The external customer domains list has been a recurring source of issues for us.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Mimecast vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint has 15 user reviews and Mimecast has 11. The average star rating for Proofpoint is 4.66 while Mimecast has an average rating of 4.45. Proofpoint has more positive reviews than Mimecast. Comparing Mimecast vs. Proofpoint reviews, Proofpoint has stronger overall reviews.
Mimecast vs. Proofpoint both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Reporting & Analytics, Disaster Recovery, Systems/Administrative, Compliance Accreditations, Data Management, Data Migration, Reminders/Alerts, Supported Technologies, Limits. In our feature comparison of Mimecast vs. Proofpoint, Mimecast offers more of the most popular features and tools than Proofpoint.
In our pricing comparison of Mimecast vs. Proofpoint, Proofpoint's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Proofpoint's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Mimecast vs. Proofpoint shows that Mimecast scores higher in usability for meets requirements, quality of support. Proofpoint scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but Mimecast has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
