In our comparison of JazzHR vs. Jobvite, Jobvite is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Using JazzHR has been helpful so far, they also are very eager at answering questions when we encountered issues.
JazzHR is a trustworthy system. Its ease of use and the ability to communicate with your team using the chat-like feature makes it the perfect formula for an ideal workflow. It might not sound that great, but communication is one of the most critical elements for a small HR team.
A mobile app would make it more convenient. I heard that there would be a feature that gives you options for access levels in future updates; it would be a great and helpful addition.
It enhances centralized communication, integration with tools like LinkedIn Recruiter and others is great, tracking the origin of applicants is great and simple if the software is used accurately by your recruiters, and it puts plenty of structure in a manner that is simple to use.
Has a slow development pace, standard automization, subpar reporting feature if you fail to perform any Jobvite customization, and the functionality of the CRM is standard.
JazzHR has helped us improve our ability to track and manage applicants and create a consistent experience about the candidate through the entire process.
It has the features and functionality of many bigger and expensive options available with added advantage of affordable prices for smaller companies. The careers page, candidate texting and unlimited users with commitment every month were the main attractions for us as our company was new to using an ATS and did not want a long term commitment for the time being.
The major con right now is the reports which are not easy to navigate. It is also a fact that we have not learnt much about it yet and still use customized reports to get the information required. I don't find any other con as such so far.
All the fundamental functionality is available, looking at the applicant activity, workflow, and generating an open letter is simple.
Slow, bothersome, and clunky, searching for an applicant by mane is very difficult, and most of the times, the software is non-functional.
Using JazzHR has been helpful so far, they also are very eager at answering questions when we encountered issues.
JazzHR is a trustworthy system. Its ease of use and the ability to communicate with your team using the chat-like feature makes it the perfect formula for an ideal workflow. It might not sound that great, but communication is one of the most critical elements for a small HR team.
A mobile app would make it more convenient. I heard that there would be a feature that gives you options for access levels in future updates; it would be a great and helpful addition.
JazzHR has helped us improve our ability to track and manage applicants and create a consistent experience about the candidate through the entire process.
It has the features and functionality of many bigger and expensive options available with added advantage of affordable prices for smaller companies. The careers page, candidate texting and unlimited users with commitment every month were the main attractions for us as our company was new to using an ATS and did not want a long term commitment for the time being.
The major con right now is the reports which are not easy to navigate. It is also a fact that we have not learnt much about it yet and still use customized reports to get the information required. I don't find any other con as such so far.
It enhances centralized communication, integration with tools like LinkedIn Recruiter and others is great, tracking the origin of applicants is great and simple if the software is used accurately by your recruiters, and it puts plenty of structure in a manner that is simple to use.
Has a slow development pace, standard automization, subpar reporting feature if you fail to perform any Jobvite customization, and the functionality of the CRM is standard.
All the fundamental functionality is available, looking at the applicant activity, workflow, and generating an open letter is simple.
Slow, bothersome, and clunky, searching for an applicant by mane is very difficult, and most of the times, the software is non-functional.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of JazzHR vs. Jobvite, JazzHR has 108 user reviews and Jobvite has 54. The average star rating for JazzHR is 4.40 while Jobvite has an average rating of 4.20. JazzHR has more positive reviews than Jobvite. Comparing JazzHR vs. Jobvite reviews, JazzHR has stronger overall reviews.
JazzHR vs. Jobvite both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Employee Management, Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Portal Types, File Management, Signature Management, Reminders/Alerts, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of JazzHR vs. Jobvite, JazzHR offers more of the most popular features and tools than Jobvite.
In our pricing comparison of JazzHR vs. Jobvite, Jobvite's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Jobvite's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of JazzHR vs. Jobvite shows that Jobvite scores higher in usability for learning curve. JazzHR scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Jobvite has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
