In our comparison of Gusto vs. Namely, Gusto is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Operating it is extremely simple, they have great client care, and its value for money is good.
Using it is simple, and the incorporations with other systems e.g. QB, TurboTax, etc. are numerous.
Small organizations find it quite pricey and client care response is slow.
You can interact with one another using the feed on the homepage e.g. Facebook, tagging other members, transparency, report generation, auto analysis of various data, documentation, etc. is possible as tabs are easily organized with features such as tasks lists.
Auto analysis for engagement in the feed is lacking, it blocks you from continuing work by not automatically signaling you that you don’t have access at your level.
Simple entering of payroll, paying and monitoring. Payroll accounting is eased by collaboration with Xero and QB.
The interface is difficult to use at times
HR can have great help from it. In fact, the whole company can be benefitted rightly.
The CA payroll options need a good update.
Operating it is extremely simple, they have great client care, and its value for money is good.
Using it is simple, and the incorporations with other systems e.g. QB, TurboTax, etc. are numerous.
Small organizations find it quite pricey and client care response is slow.
Simple entering of payroll, paying and monitoring. Payroll accounting is eased by collaboration with Xero and QB.
The interface is difficult to use at times
You can interact with one another using the feed on the homepage e.g. Facebook, tagging other members, transparency, report generation, auto analysis of various data, documentation, etc. is possible as tabs are easily organized with features such as tasks lists.
Auto analysis for engagement in the feed is lacking, it blocks you from continuing work by not automatically signaling you that you don’t have access at your level.
HR can have great help from it. In fact, the whole company can be benefitted rightly.
The CA payroll options need a good update.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Gusto vs. Namely, Gusto has 87 user reviews and Namely has 51. The average star rating for Gusto is 4.52 while Namely has an average rating of 3.94. Gusto has more positive reviews than Namely. Comparing Gusto vs. Namely reviews, Gusto has stronger overall reviews.
Gusto vs. Namely both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Employee Management, Talent Management , Workforce Optimization, Payroll Management, Attendance Management, Tax Management, Supported Tax Forms, Reporting & Analytics, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Clock-In/Clock-Out Options, Customizable Items, Report Management, Portal Types, File Management, Signature Management, Collaboration Tools, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Workflow Automation, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Payment Options, Supported Devices/Hardware. In our feature comparison of Gusto vs. Namely, Gusto offers more of the most popular features and tools than Namely.
In our pricing comparison of Gusto vs. Namely, Namely's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Namely's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Gusto vs. Namely shows that Gusto scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Namely scores higher in , but Gusto has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
