In our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Zoho Meeting, Dialpad Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
My use of zoho is only for meetings. I understand how important the quality of sound and video is when you are having an important but distant meeting. While working with other tools I always had some issues. But with Zoho, my experience is quite outstanding.
It is very easy in use and its simple interface facilitates the ease. I will not claim it to be the best but I consider it to be the easiest. The speed with which it gets connected can beat any better software.
I would like to be additional features added.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
Good fundamental features e.g. screen sharing, invites, calls, etc.
Occasional disconnecting of screen sharing, audio quality is poor at times.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
My use of zoho is only for meetings. I understand how important the quality of sound and video is when you are having an important but distant meeting. While working with other tools I always had some issues. But with Zoho, my experience is quite outstanding.
It is very easy in use and its simple interface facilitates the ease. I will not claim it to be the best but I consider it to be the easiest. The speed with which it gets connected can beat any better software.
I would like to be additional features added.
Good fundamental features e.g. screen sharing, invites, calls, etc.
Occasional disconnecting of screen sharing, audio quality is poor at times.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Zoho Meeting, Zoho Meeting has 28 user reviews and Dialpad Meetings has 49. The average star rating for Zoho Meeting is 4.67 while Dialpad Meetings has an average rating of 4.53. Zoho Meeting has more positive reviews than Dialpad Meetings. Comparing Dialpad Meetings vs. Zoho Meeting reviews, Zoho Meeting has stronger overall reviews.
Dialpad Meetings vs. Zoho Meeting both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, Language & Speech, Reminders/Alerts, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Zoho Meeting, Dialpad Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than Zoho Meeting.
In our pricing comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Zoho Meeting, Zoho Meeting's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to Zoho Meeting's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Zoho Meeting shows that Dialpad Meetings scores higher in usability for ease of use, ease of admin. Zoho Meeting scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but Dialpad Meetings has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
