In our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Oracle Beehive, Dialpad Meetings is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Using this SAAS solution has helped us reduce costs associated with accommodating changing customer demands. It not only cuts down expenses but also enhances the overall customer experience."
The ease of use and the comprehensive solution it offers by combining email and team collaboration as a SAAS.
While there are no major issues, there is room for improvement in terms of service.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
We are utilizing Beehive as a software-as-a-service solution in the cloud. Its flexibility in usage is a significant advantage. The collaborative features integrated with Outlook are highly beneficial, and the performance surpasses traditional mailing or messaging services."
I appreciate the flexible deployment options and centralized administration provided by Beehive. It also offers seamless integration with various large applications and components, along with instant messaging capabilities. In comparison to Outlook, Beehive stands out as a superior choice.
One drawback is the limited database storage it provides, and the out-of-the-box experience could be improved. I believe the tool could benefit from additional features such as user configurations and increased database storage capacity.
Connecting with many customers and project teams is simple using UberConference. It is simple to set up a warranted group call, run it without any problems for the most part and take care of the invites too.
My customers don’t have to pay for a subscription as most times the free plan is sufficient for a few of my smaller projects, using phone or computer for audio or calling in through browser or phone is flexible, in case a person is feeding back or making distracting noise, you can mute others on the call, novices can navigate the software with ease as the software is intuitive, well designed, and visually clean, and it is simple to share screens from inside Chrome.
Screen sharing with browsers could be added, for those viewing in browser that must mute themselves, type chat plus audio.
Extremely great client service, its design is beautifully done exclusively for screen sharing and audio conferencing purposes. Also, it directly results in an extremely clear voice and high quality high definition crisp, and during screen sharing the picture quality is exceptional.
Any team that wishes to enhance productivity should try the free or paid plans.
You can join the conference call after simply clicking a link, has exceptional screen sharing, persons up to 10 to 11 per call use it at no cost, anyone can mute the other person, you can view and talk/listen through laptop or when viewing the screen share through laptop you can call in through phone.
Lack of support of the screenshare option on Firefox browsers. The options for audio drop down tab don’t appear when connecting through laptop.
Using this SAAS solution has helped us reduce costs associated with accommodating changing customer demands. It not only cuts down expenses but also enhances the overall customer experience."
The ease of use and the comprehensive solution it offers by combining email and team collaboration as a SAAS.
While there are no major issues, there is room for improvement in terms of service.
We are utilizing Beehive as a software-as-a-service solution in the cloud. Its flexibility in usage is a significant advantage. The collaborative features integrated with Outlook are highly beneficial, and the performance surpasses traditional mailing or messaging services."
I appreciate the flexible deployment options and centralized administration provided by Beehive. It also offers seamless integration with various large applications and components, along with instant messaging capabilities. In comparison to Outlook, Beehive stands out as a superior choice.
One drawback is the limited database storage it provides, and the out-of-the-box experience could be improved. I believe the tool could benefit from additional features such as user configurations and increased database storage capacity.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Oracle Beehive, Dialpad Meetings has 49 user reviews and Oracle Beehive has 5. The average star rating for Dialpad Meetings is 4.53 while Oracle Beehive has an average rating of 4.4. Dialpad Meetings has more positive reviews than Oracle Beehive. Comparing Dialpad Meetings vs. Oracle Beehive reviews, Dialpad Meetings has stronger overall reviews.
Dialpad Meetings vs. Oracle Beehive both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Conferencing Capabilities, Remote Support Features, Call Management & Administration, Collaboration Tools, Language & Speech, Reminders/Alerts, Enhancements & Personalization, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Identity and Access Management (IAM), Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Oracle Beehive, Dialpad Meetings offers more of the most popular features and tools than Oracle Beehive.
In our pricing comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Oracle Beehive, Oracle Beehive's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Oracle Beehive's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Dialpad Meetings vs. Oracle Beehive shows that Oracle Beehive scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements. Dialpad Meetings scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Oracle Beehive has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
