In our comparison of Bigtincan vs. Qwilr, Qwilr is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Qwilr effectively solves the problem of quotes becoming stagnant and losing momentum. With the ability to track when quotes have been viewed, we can proactively follow up with customers when necessary. This feature allows us to identify opportunities for additional touch points with our customers, ensuring that our quotes stay relevant and compelling. It has been a valuable asset in maintaining engagement with potential clients and ultimately driving more successful sales conversions.
As a technology services company, we emphasize the importance of partnership from the first interaction with our brand online to the closing sales meeting. Qwilr enables us to extend that narrative seamlessly into the agreement phase, which adds significant value to our business.
I'm not particularly fond of is the feature limitations in the product, especially concerning branding.
N/A
The adaptable design and easily navigable templates of Qwilr facilitate the creation of polished proposals on all platforms. Although the program's features might restrict design freedom, Qwilr is a useful tool for expediting proposal preparation and delivery due to its frequent upgrades and attentive support.
Templates are good and easy to edit
Designs are limited
Qwilr effectively solves the problem of quotes becoming stagnant and losing momentum. With the ability to track when quotes have been viewed, we can proactively follow up with customers when necessary. This feature allows us to identify opportunities for additional touch points with our customers, ensuring that our quotes stay relevant and compelling. It has been a valuable asset in maintaining engagement with potential clients and ultimately driving more successful sales conversions.
As a technology services company, we emphasize the importance of partnership from the first interaction with our brand online to the closing sales meeting. Qwilr enables us to extend that narrative seamlessly into the agreement phase, which adds significant value to our business.
I'm not particularly fond of is the feature limitations in the product, especially concerning branding.
The adaptable design and easily navigable templates of Qwilr facilitate the creation of polished proposals on all platforms. Although the program's features might restrict design freedom, Qwilr is a useful tool for expediting proposal preparation and delivery due to its frequent upgrades and attentive support.
Templates are good and easy to edit
Designs are limited
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Bigtincan vs. Qwilr, Qwilr has 26 user reviews and Bigtincan has 0. The average star rating for Qwilr is 4.69 while Bigtincan has an average rating of 0.0. Qwilr has more positive reviews than Bigtincan. Comparing Bigtincan vs. Qwilr reviews, Qwilr has stronger overall reviews.
Bigtincan vs. Qwilr both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Lead Management, Campaign Management, Content Management, Reporting & Analytics, Recording , Signature Management, Signature Types, File Management, Collaboration Tools, Learning Management, Data Migration, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Third-Party Integrations, Google Workspace, Zoho, Integration Options, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, After-Sales Service, Customizable Items, Cash Flow Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM). In our feature comparison of Bigtincan vs. Qwilr, Qwilr offers more of the most popular features and tools than Bigtincan.
In our pricing comparison of Bigtincan vs. Qwilr, Qwilr's pricing starts at $35/month and is more affordable compared to Qwilr's starting cost of $35/month.
Our comparison of Bigtincan vs. Qwilr shows that Qwilr scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Bigtincan scores higher in , but Qwilr has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
