In our comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ZipRecruiter, ATS OnDemand is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Ensure you're precise in your communications regarding how you'd like your job pages to appear. Converse with the support team via phone and writing.
Software has great functionality, its design is continually being enhanced by the development team, has an exceptional customer support team which is very responsive and communicates in a courteous manner.
None
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
Generally great software with a very responsive and factual support team.
Quite a complete hiring software
Not very user-friendly in terms of sending emails. It's not possible to email applicants from ATS as they always go to the spam folder.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
Ensure you're precise in your communications regarding how you'd like your job pages to appear. Converse with the support team via phone and writing.
Software has great functionality, its design is continually being enhanced by the development team, has an exceptional customer support team which is very responsive and communicates in a courteous manner.
None
Generally great software with a very responsive and factual support team.
Quite a complete hiring software
Not very user-friendly in terms of sending emails. It's not possible to email applicants from ATS as they always go to the spam folder.
This platform is effective for advertising and spreading the word about available job positions.
I suggest utilizing this resource to attract potential candidates and assess their level of engagement.
The advantage of this platform is that it can attract active candidates who are actively searching for opportunities.
Even if candidates do not meet the criteria, their applications are still showcased. It would be convenient to have a dedicated space to review them at your convenience.
ZipRecruiter helps us to find quality candidates for interview and subsequently to recruit. We greatly endorse this software.
Powerful search, wonderful interface, ability to send messages to people within the site, and a very exceptional customer support team.
Quite aggressive follow-ups from the sales personnel, and the search occasionally pulls in useless candidates.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ZipRecruiter, ATS OnDemand has 26 user reviews and ZipRecruiter has 113. The average star rating for ATS OnDemand is 4.30 while ZipRecruiter has an average rating of 4.15. ATS OnDemand has more positive reviews than ZipRecruiter. Comparing ATS OnDemand vs. ZipRecruiter reviews, ATS OnDemand has stronger overall reviews.
ATS OnDemand vs. ZipRecruiter both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Talent Management , Employee Management, Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Portal Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ZipRecruiter, ATS OnDemand offers more of the most popular features and tools than ZipRecruiter.
In our pricing comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ZipRecruiter, ZipRecruiter's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ZipRecruiter's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of ATS OnDemand vs. ZipRecruiter shows that ATS OnDemand scores higher in usability for ease of use, quality of support. ZipRecruiter scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but ATS OnDemand has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
