In our comparison of Alfresco vs. Sitefinity, Alfresco is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
The experience with Sitefinity is satisfactory. They have great client service-responsive and extremely helpful.
Using it is easy, building the structure of your pages is easy thanks to the drag and drop features, getting started is aided by the numerous page templates, making edits at a template or page level is possible, and on the template level, it is possible to easily fix several pages that require the same edit.
Getting logged out is very common, pages get locked unintentionally, and unlocking the pages on demand is not possible if you don’t have admin permission.
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
You can fully customize Sitefinity as it is a simply lightweight .NET based CMS.
The learning curve is extremely small, it is fast to get started and functioning, the community has fast advent of updates with fixes and features, and handling thousands of pages is possible to the software.
Especially during upgrades, a few features are finicky, non-consistent backend interface, and unavailable caching options.
The product excels in managing a vast archive of documents spanning over 25 years. It significantly simplifies document approval processes, facilitates records conversion, and enables efficient archival of older documents.
Effective Document Workflow Functionality. User-Friendly Document Metadata Management. Developer and End-User Friendly Interface
Increasing Complexity of Local Installation Post-Version 5.1.1.4. Customization Deployment Challenges in Alfresco
It has great customization features, it is compatible with multiple types of files, work flow options are great, it is easy to search for documents, the ability to customize your summary of that project, offering visuals to members thanks to the setting of the dashboard on every site, and the ability to know if the project is website based courtesy of the live browser frame.
The interface could be better, unlocking all the functionality and features available to you takes the usability some time.
The experience with Sitefinity is satisfactory. They have great client service-responsive and extremely helpful.
Using it is easy, building the structure of your pages is easy thanks to the drag and drop features, getting started is aided by the numerous page templates, making edits at a template or page level is possible, and on the template level, it is possible to easily fix several pages that require the same edit.
Getting logged out is very common, pages get locked unintentionally, and unlocking the pages on demand is not possible if you don’t have admin permission.
You can fully customize Sitefinity as it is a simply lightweight .NET based CMS.
The learning curve is extremely small, it is fast to get started and functioning, the community has fast advent of updates with fixes and features, and handling thousands of pages is possible to the software.
Especially during upgrades, a few features are finicky, non-consistent backend interface, and unavailable caching options.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Alfresco vs. Sitefinity, Alfresco has 13 user reviews and Sitefinity has 12. The average star rating for Alfresco is 4.38 while Sitefinity has an average rating of 3.91. Alfresco has more positive reviews than Sitefinity. Comparing Alfresco vs. Sitefinity reviews, Alfresco has stronger overall reviews.
Alfresco vs. Sitefinity both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Content Management, File Management, Data Management, Supported Content Types, Search Tools, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Language & Speech, Customizable Items, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, Business Units/Areas Covered. In our feature comparison of Alfresco vs. Sitefinity, Sitefinity offers more of the most popular features and tools than Alfresco.
In our pricing comparison of Alfresco vs. Sitefinity, Sitefinity's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Sitefinity's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Alfresco vs. Sitefinity shows that Alfresco scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. Sitefinity scores higher in setup & support, quality of support, but Alfresco has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
