In our comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
NetSuite has enabled us to automate numerous procedures and the interface is normally user-friendly. Also, we have dependable numbers and the ability to develop a search or report to facilitate analysis of information. NetSuite is generally great.
Scalable, customizable, offers plenty of process automation, it’s a better source of record-keeping as all is rather flawlessly linked, very helpful batch upload of journal entries/transactions and upload in general, and a great ability to report on all assets and have their history in a single place id helpful for audit purposes.
Presently, we’re implementing regulations for 606 and the multi-book and ARM add-ons have emerged to be extremely helpful for our reporting needs. The search function has great adaptability for creating reports for end month reconciliation needs.
SuiteAnswers has an awful algorithm for their search bar, the system is not very intuitive since the real home screen is personalized by role, and the call center isn’t as helpful as the US based analysts at NetSuite. Also, since our software is hosted, it sometimes functions slower than I’d want it to.
We can now automate our marketing roles and have a wider view into our ROI on the said roles thanks to SharpSpring
Centrally collaborating a vast variety of marketing and sales features is possible.
An aspect to put a tracking code is lacking in the social planner.
While handling campaigns, it runs smoothly
Knowing where you are in the system is difficult.
Automating organizations selling activities is possible courtesy of SarpSpring.
Has a relatively tiny learning curve at the beginning
Implementing some functions is a process.
NetSuite has enabled us to automate numerous procedures and the interface is normally user-friendly. Also, we have dependable numbers and the ability to develop a search or report to facilitate analysis of information. NetSuite is generally great.
Scalable, customizable, offers plenty of process automation, it’s a better source of record-keeping as all is rather flawlessly linked, very helpful batch upload of journal entries/transactions and upload in general, and a great ability to report on all assets and have their history in a single place id helpful for audit purposes.
Presently, we’re implementing regulations for 606 and the multi-book and ARM add-ons have emerged to be extremely helpful for our reporting needs. The search function has great adaptability for creating reports for end month reconciliation needs.
SuiteAnswers has an awful algorithm for their search bar, the system is not very intuitive since the real home screen is personalized by role, and the call center isn’t as helpful as the US based analysts at NetSuite. Also, since our software is hosted, it sometimes functions slower than I’d want it to.
While handling campaigns, it runs smoothly
Knowing where you are in the system is difficult.
We can now automate our marketing roles and have a wider view into our ROI on the said roles thanks to SharpSpring
Centrally collaborating a vast variety of marketing and sales features is possible.
An aspect to put a tracking code is lacking in the social planner.
Automating organizations selling activities is possible courtesy of SarpSpring.
Has a relatively tiny learning curve at the beginning
Implementing some functions is a process.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring has 294 user reviews and Adobe Campaign has 42. The average star rating for SharpSpring is 4.63 while Adobe Campaign has an average rating of 4.26. SharpSpring has more positive reviews than Adobe Campaign. Comparing Adobe Campaign vs. SharpSpring reviews, SharpSpring has stronger overall reviews.
Adobe Campaign vs. SharpSpring both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Lead Management, Campaign Management, Campaign Types, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Channels, User Calls-to-Action, Chat/IM Management, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring offers more of the most popular features and tools than Adobe Campaign.
In our pricing comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring's pricing starts at $449/month and is more affordable compared to SharpSpring's starting cost of $449/month.
Our comparison of Adobe Campaign vs. SharpSpring shows that SharpSpring scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Adobe Campaign scores higher in , but SharpSpring has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
