In our comparison of Tenable One vs. iboss, iboss is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Tenable.IO effectively addresses the challenge of understanding risks and prioritizing vulnerability management. By utilizing the product, organizations can gain valuable insights into their security posture, enabling them to focus on mitigating the most critical vulnerabilities and reducing overall risk exposure.
I appreciate that Tenable.IO offers exceptional reporting and dashboard capabilities, which make it easy to comprehend and prioritize remediation efforts based on risk assessment.
Although not a specific issue with Tenable.IO itself, it is worth noting that better results can be achieved using agents for vulnerability detection compared to active scanning.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Tenable.io effectively addresses the challenges of scanning, reporting, and monitoring the progress of remediation efforts. Its straightforward setup allows for easy scheduling, allowing Tenable to perform its scanning tasks autonomously. While it is still advisable to review the results in the console, scheduled reports are also available for convenience.
I appreciate that Tenable.io is a reliable and effective solution that seamlessly performs its intended functions. It offers the flexibility to deploy internal scanners or utilize their cloud-hosted scanners for external perimeter scanning. Tenable consistently stays updated with current events, regularly providing new plugins to detect the latest vulnerabilities.
While Tenable.io continually works on expanding its functionality, some tweaks are being made to the console. This includes the addition of more reporting, dashboards, and remediation scans. Additionally, the presence of both old and new methods of tagging and grouping can be confusing for new users. However, I believe efforts are being made to address this issue and streamline the process.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Tenable.IO effectively addresses the challenge of understanding risks and prioritizing vulnerability management. By utilizing the product, organizations can gain valuable insights into their security posture, enabling them to focus on mitigating the most critical vulnerabilities and reducing overall risk exposure.
I appreciate that Tenable.IO offers exceptional reporting and dashboard capabilities, which make it easy to comprehend and prioritize remediation efforts based on risk assessment.
Although not a specific issue with Tenable.IO itself, it is worth noting that better results can be achieved using agents for vulnerability detection compared to active scanning.
Tenable.io effectively addresses the challenges of scanning, reporting, and monitoring the progress of remediation efforts. Its straightforward setup allows for easy scheduling, allowing Tenable to perform its scanning tasks autonomously. While it is still advisable to review the results in the console, scheduled reports are also available for convenience.
I appreciate that Tenable.io is a reliable and effective solution that seamlessly performs its intended functions. It offers the flexibility to deploy internal scanners or utilize their cloud-hosted scanners for external perimeter scanning. Tenable consistently stays updated with current events, regularly providing new plugins to detect the latest vulnerabilities.
While Tenable.io continually works on expanding its functionality, some tweaks are being made to the console. This includes the addition of more reporting, dashboards, and remediation scans. Additionally, the presence of both old and new methods of tagging and grouping can be confusing for new users. However, I believe efforts are being made to address this issue and streamline the process.
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Tenable One vs. iboss, Tenable One has 13 user reviews and iboss has 10. The average star rating for Tenable One is 4.38 while iboss has an average rating of 4.1. Tenable One has more positive reviews than iboss. Comparing Tenable One vs. iboss reviews, Tenable One has stronger overall reviews.
Tenable One vs. iboss both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Data Management, Systems/Administrative. In our feature comparison of Tenable One vs. iboss, iboss offers more of the most popular features and tools than Tenable One.
In our pricing comparison of Tenable One vs. iboss, iboss's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to iboss's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Tenable One vs. iboss shows that iboss scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support. Tenable One scores higher in learning curve, ease of admin, but iboss has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
