In our comparison of Syxsense vs. ThreatConnect, Syxsense is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
I enjoy how well-done the after-sales service is and how well-equipped it is to help you customize the device to your requirements. It is an excellent product that serves our needs quite well.
High quality, customizing, and trustworthy
None
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Syxsense plays a crucial role in identifying and resolving vulnerabilities within our system. By using this software, we are able to proactively address security issues and ensure the protection of our environment. It streamlines the vulnerability management process and provides us with peace of mind, knowing that our systems are secure and protected from potential threats."
I appreciate the simplicity of Syxsense when it comes to identifying and resolving security issues within our environment. The ability to click and remediate these issues is a valuable feature that saves time and effort.
One drawback I have encountered is the limited ability to reverse remediations. It would be beneficial to have more flexibility in undoing or reversing actions taken during the remediation process.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
I enjoy how well-done the after-sales service is and how well-equipped it is to help you customize the device to your requirements. It is an excellent product that serves our needs quite well.
High quality, customizing, and trustworthy
None
Syxsense plays a crucial role in identifying and resolving vulnerabilities within our system. By using this software, we are able to proactively address security issues and ensure the protection of our environment. It streamlines the vulnerability management process and provides us with peace of mind, knowing that our systems are secure and protected from potential threats."
I appreciate the simplicity of Syxsense when it comes to identifying and resolving security issues within our environment. The ability to click and remediate these issues is a valuable feature that saves time and effort.
One drawback I have encountered is the limited ability to reverse remediations. It would be beneficial to have more flexibility in undoing or reversing actions taken during the remediation process.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Syxsense vs. ThreatConnect, Syxsense has 14 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Syxsense is 4.64 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Syxsense has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Syxsense vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Syxsense has stronger overall reviews.
Syxsense vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Compliance Accreditations, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Collaboration Tools, Report Management, Customizable Items, Integration Options, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Syxsense vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect offers more of the most popular features and tools than Syxsense.
In our pricing comparison of Syxsense vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Syxsense vs. ThreatConnect shows that Syxsense scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. ThreatConnect scores higher in ease of admin, but Syxsense has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
