In our comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Unit4, SAP S/4HANA is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
Agresso enables users to simply track transactions and locate supporting documentation. Furthermore, customers can modify reports to their preferences, which can save an immense amount of time. When the setup box is open, users are unable to use the paste option.
Transcation tracking is easier and can find backing document
Paste option can't be used when the setup box is opened
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
There are no redeeming features that I can identify, aside from perhaps the introductory page design.
I found it to be quite challenging to operate. Unfortunately, the drop-down menu is not user-friendly, and it is not intuitive how to find the relevant keywords. Additionally, the software is unreliable as it frequently crashes in the middle of work, and there is no recovery or automatic saving. Furthermore, the error reporting system is not helpful, and it is difficult to determine what went wrong. If there is a problem, it is impossible to save the page, and all work is lost.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Agresso enables users to simply track transactions and locate supporting documentation. Furthermore, customers can modify reports to their preferences, which can save an immense amount of time. When the setup box is open, users are unable to use the paste option.
Transcation tracking is easier and can find backing document
Paste option can't be used when the setup box is opened
There are no redeeming features that I can identify, aside from perhaps the introductory page design.
I found it to be quite challenging to operate. Unfortunately, the drop-down menu is not user-friendly, and it is not intuitive how to find the relevant keywords. Additionally, the software is unreliable as it frequently crashes in the middle of work, and there is no recovery or automatic saving. Furthermore, the error reporting system is not helpful, and it is difficult to determine what went wrong. If there is a problem, it is impossible to save the page, and all work is lost.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Unit4, SAP S/4HANA has 98 user reviews and Unit4 has 12. The average star rating for SAP S/4HANA is 4.27 while Unit4 has an average rating of 3.16. SAP S/4HANA has more positive reviews than Unit4. Comparing SAP S/4HANA vs. Unit4 reviews, SAP S/4HANA has stronger overall reviews.
SAP S/4HANA vs. Unit4 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Customer Management, Accounting Features, Employee Management, Project Management Features, Payroll Management, Lead Management, Event Management, Asset Management, Campaign Management, Tax Management, Supported Tax Forms, Reporting & Analytics, Shipping & Logistics Management, Workforce Optimization, Resource Management, Workflow Automation, Expense Management, File Management, Collaboration Tools, Conferencing Capabilities, Portal Types, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Report Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies, Campaign Types, Chat/IM Management, Route Management. In our feature comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Unit4, SAP S/4HANA offers more of the most popular features and tools than Unit4.
In our pricing comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Unit4, Unit4's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Unit4's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of SAP S/4HANA vs. Unit4 shows that SAP S/4HANA scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support. Unit4 scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, ease of admin, but SAP S/4HANA has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
