In our comparison of QT9 ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Production scheduling and shipping is so much easier than the pen, paper, and spreadsheet way. Prior to using QT9 we would have to break into production runs to complete missed or late orders. Those are now issues of the past, any break in production runs are now due to a customers request. Investing money into QT9 and using all the functions has been the biggest business improvement we've had. From Sales Orders to Shipping all the information needed is in one place. Production runs very efficiently. If you have a small to medium sized company still operating the old way please look into QT9 to solve many of the issues you're having from purchasing, sales, production, and shipping. We found to meet our customers demands we didn't need to add additional machinery, just improve the production efficiency of what we already had.
The software is easy to use for all users regardless of their computer skill level. It has reduced paperwork, increased productivity, and given us visibility into a packed warehouse.
There are no glaring issues with the software. QT9 is constantly being improved and their support team is good about integrating feature requests.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
Production scheduling and shipping is so much easier than the pen, paper, and spreadsheet way. Prior to using QT9 we would have to break into production runs to complete missed or late orders. Those are now issues of the past, any break in production runs are now due to a customers request. Investing money into QT9 and using all the functions has been the biggest business improvement we've had. From Sales Orders to Shipping all the information needed is in one place. Production runs very efficiently. If you have a small to medium sized company still operating the old way please look into QT9 to solve many of the issues you're having from purchasing, sales, production, and shipping. We found to meet our customers demands we didn't need to add additional machinery, just improve the production efficiency of what we already had.
The software is easy to use for all users regardless of their computer skill level. It has reduced paperwork, increased productivity, and given us visibility into a packed warehouse.
There are no glaring issues with the software. QT9 is constantly being improved and their support team is good about integrating feature requests.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Production scheduling and shipping is so much easier than the pen, paper, and spreadsheet way. Prior to using QT9 we would have to break into production runs to complete missed or late orders. Those are now issues of the past, any break in production runs are now due to a customers request. Investing money into QT9 and using all the functions has been the biggest business improvement we've had. From Sales Orders to Shipping all the information needed is in one place. Production runs very efficiently. If you have a small to medium sized company still operating the old way please look into QT9 to solve many of the issues you're having from purchasing, sales, production, and shipping. We found to meet our customers demands we didn't need to add additional machinery, just improve the production efficiency of what we already had.
The software is easy to use for all users regardless of their computer skill level. It has reduced paperwork, increased productivity, and given us visibility into a packed warehouse.
There are no glaring issues with the software. QT9 is constantly being improved and their support team is good about integrating feature requests.
Production scheduling and shipping is so much easier than the pen, paper, and spreadsheet way. Prior to using QT9 we would have to break into production runs to complete missed or late orders. Those are now issues of the past, any break in production runs are now due to a customers request. Investing money into QT9 and using all the functions has been the biggest business improvement we've had. From Sales Orders to Shipping all the information needed is in one place. Production runs very efficiently. If you have a small to medium sized company still operating the old way please look into QT9 to solve many of the issues you're having from purchasing, sales, production, and shipping. We found to meet our customers demands we didn't need to add additional machinery, just improve the production efficiency of what we already had.
The software is easy to use for all users regardless of their computer skill level. It has reduced paperwork, increased productivity, and given us visibility into a packed warehouse.
There are no glaring issues with the software. QT9 is constantly being improved and their support team is good about integrating feature requests.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QT9 ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA, QT9 ERP has 1 user reviews and SAP S/4HANA has 98. The average star rating for QT9 ERP is 5 while SAP S/4HANA has an average rating of 4.27. QT9 ERP has more positive reviews than SAP S/4HANA. Comparing QT9 ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA reviews, QT9 ERP has stronger overall reviews.
QT9 ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Customer Management, Accounting Features, Employee Management, Lead Management, Event Management, Asset Management, Campaign Management, Tax Management, Supported Tax Forms, Reporting & Analytics, Workforce Optimization, Payroll Management, Shipping & Logistics Management, Workflow Automation, Expense Management, Project Management Features, Resource Management, File Management, Collaboration Tools, Conferencing Capabilities, Portal Types, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Report Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies, Campaign Types, Chat/IM Management. In our feature comparison of QT9 ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA offers more of the most popular features and tools than QT9 ERP.
In our pricing comparison of QT9 ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to SAP S/4HANA's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QT9 ERP vs. SAP S/4HANA shows that SAP S/4HANA scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. QT9 ERP scores higher in , but SAP S/4HANA has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
