In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Tenable One, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
Tenable.IO effectively addresses the challenge of understanding risks and prioritizing vulnerability management. By utilizing the product, organizations can gain valuable insights into their security posture, enabling them to focus on mitigating the most critical vulnerabilities and reducing overall risk exposure.
I appreciate that Tenable.IO offers exceptional reporting and dashboard capabilities, which make it easy to comprehend and prioritize remediation efforts based on risk assessment.
Although not a specific issue with Tenable.IO itself, it is worth noting that better results can be achieved using agents for vulnerability detection compared to active scanning.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Tenable.io effectively addresses the challenges of scanning, reporting, and monitoring the progress of remediation efforts. Its straightforward setup allows for easy scheduling, allowing Tenable to perform its scanning tasks autonomously. While it is still advisable to review the results in the console, scheduled reports are also available for convenience.
I appreciate that Tenable.io is a reliable and effective solution that seamlessly performs its intended functions. It offers the flexibility to deploy internal scanners or utilize their cloud-hosted scanners for external perimeter scanning. Tenable consistently stays updated with current events, regularly providing new plugins to detect the latest vulnerabilities.
While Tenable.io continually works on expanding its functionality, some tweaks are being made to the console. This includes the addition of more reporting, dashboards, and remediation scans. Additionally, the presence of both old and new methods of tagging and grouping can be confusing for new users. However, I believe efforts are being made to address this issue and streamline the process.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Tenable.IO effectively addresses the challenge of understanding risks and prioritizing vulnerability management. By utilizing the product, organizations can gain valuable insights into their security posture, enabling them to focus on mitigating the most critical vulnerabilities and reducing overall risk exposure.
I appreciate that Tenable.IO offers exceptional reporting and dashboard capabilities, which make it easy to comprehend and prioritize remediation efforts based on risk assessment.
Although not a specific issue with Tenable.IO itself, it is worth noting that better results can be achieved using agents for vulnerability detection compared to active scanning.
Tenable.io effectively addresses the challenges of scanning, reporting, and monitoring the progress of remediation efforts. Its straightforward setup allows for easy scheduling, allowing Tenable to perform its scanning tasks autonomously. While it is still advisable to review the results in the console, scheduled reports are also available for convenience.
I appreciate that Tenable.io is a reliable and effective solution that seamlessly performs its intended functions. It offers the flexibility to deploy internal scanners or utilize their cloud-hosted scanners for external perimeter scanning. Tenable consistently stays updated with current events, regularly providing new plugins to detect the latest vulnerabilities.
While Tenable.io continually works on expanding its functionality, some tweaks are being made to the console. This includes the addition of more reporting, dashboards, and remediation scans. Additionally, the presence of both old and new methods of tagging and grouping can be confusing for new users. However, I believe efforts are being made to address this issue and streamline the process.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Tenable One, Tenable One has 13 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Tenable One is 4.38 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Tenable One has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. Tenable One reviews, Tenable One has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. Tenable One both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Workflow Automation, Device Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Tenable One, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Tenable One.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Tenable One, Tenable One's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Tenable One's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Tenable One shows that QRadar SIEM scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support. Tenable One scores higher in learning curve, ease of admin, but QRadar SIEM has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
