In our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Syxsense, Syxsense is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
I enjoy how well-done the after-sales service is and how well-equipped it is to help you customize the device to your requirements. It is an excellent product that serves our needs quite well.
High quality, customizing, and trustworthy
None
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Syxsense plays a crucial role in identifying and resolving vulnerabilities within our system. By using this software, we are able to proactively address security issues and ensure the protection of our environment. It streamlines the vulnerability management process and provides us with peace of mind, knowing that our systems are secure and protected from potential threats."
I appreciate the simplicity of Syxsense when it comes to identifying and resolving security issues within our environment. The ability to click and remediate these issues is a valuable feature that saves time and effort.
One drawback I have encountered is the limited ability to reverse remediations. It would be beneficial to have more flexibility in undoing or reversing actions taken during the remediation process.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
I enjoy how well-done the after-sales service is and how well-equipped it is to help you customize the device to your requirements. It is an excellent product that serves our needs quite well.
High quality, customizing, and trustworthy
None
Syxsense plays a crucial role in identifying and resolving vulnerabilities within our system. By using this software, we are able to proactively address security issues and ensure the protection of our environment. It streamlines the vulnerability management process and provides us with peace of mind, knowing that our systems are secure and protected from potential threats."
I appreciate the simplicity of Syxsense when it comes to identifying and resolving security issues within our environment. The ability to click and remediate these issues is a valuable feature that saves time and effort.
One drawback I have encountered is the limited ability to reverse remediations. It would be beneficial to have more flexibility in undoing or reversing actions taken during the remediation process.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Syxsense, Syxsense has 14 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Syxsense is 4.64 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Syxsense has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing QRadar SIEM vs. Syxsense reviews, Syxsense has stronger overall reviews.
QRadar SIEM vs. Syxsense both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Device Management, Workflow Automation, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Syxsense, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Syxsense.
In our pricing comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Syxsense, Syxsense's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Syxsense's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QRadar SIEM vs. Syxsense shows that Syxsense scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support. QRadar SIEM scores higher in quality of support, ease of admin, but Syxsense has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
