In our comparison of QAD vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Deploying QAD was a breeze, and the transition from our previous ERP system to this one was remarkably smooth.
The transition from our previous ERP system to QAD was remarkably smooth.
An inconvenience arises from the fact that log-in credentials are not synchronized with users' Active Directory (AD) accounts. This lack of integration can be less than ideal.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
With QAD, we were able to address our needs for creating financial statements and operational reports, which were used both internally and externally. However, we experienced limitations in terms of user-friendliness and automation."
QAD is a highly robust software that offers extensive functionality for various accounting tasks.
Unfortunately, the user interface is subpar, and certain tasks, such as shipping and receiving, require excessive manual effort, making them inefficient.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Deploying QAD was a breeze, and the transition from our previous ERP system to this one was remarkably smooth.
The transition from our previous ERP system to QAD was remarkably smooth.
An inconvenience arises from the fact that log-in credentials are not synchronized with users' Active Directory (AD) accounts. This lack of integration can be less than ideal.
With QAD, we were able to address our needs for creating financial statements and operational reports, which were used both internally and externally. However, we experienced limitations in terms of user-friendliness and automation."
QAD is a highly robust software that offers extensive functionality for various accounting tasks.
Unfortunately, the user interface is subpar, and certain tasks, such as shipping and receiving, require excessive manual effort, making them inefficient.
SAP is undoubtedly the ideal software on the market (comprehensive CRM package) for large organizations, almost everything in the software can be configured, addictive to use after knowing how it operates, and any command that you give it will be executed provided it is well configured.
Numerous features and modules, flexible, and can be configured easily.
Expensive, terrible German tables, resources are required, and the default UI doesn't fit all.
It has a steep learning curve. Someone with strong IT skills is needed to run it.
It offers many things that are good like functionality, reports, views, and tools for analysis and forecasting.
It has a steep learning curve.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of QAD vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA has 98 user reviews and QAD has 8. The average star rating for SAP S/4HANA is 4.27 while QAD has an average rating of 3.37. SAP S/4HANA has more positive reviews than QAD. Comparing QAD vs. SAP S/4HANA reviews, SAP S/4HANA has stronger overall reviews.
QAD vs. SAP S/4HANA both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Manufacturing/Production Management, Inventory Management, Cash Flow Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Customer Management, Accounting Features, Employee Management, Asset Management, Lead Management, Event Management, Campaign Management, Tax Management, Supported Tax Forms, Reporting & Analytics, Shipping & Logistics Management, Workforce Optimization, Route Management, Payroll Management, Project Management Features, Workflow Automation, Expense Management, Resource Management, File Management, Collaboration Tools, Conferencing Capabilities, Portal Types, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Report Management, Data Management, Data Migration, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Disaster Recovery, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies, Campaign Types, Chat/IM Management. In our feature comparison of QAD vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA offers more of the most popular features and tools than QAD.
In our pricing comparison of QAD vs. SAP S/4HANA, SAP S/4HANA's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to SAP S/4HANA's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of QAD vs. SAP S/4HANA shows that SAP S/4HANA scores higher in usability for meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. QAD scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, but SAP S/4HANA has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
