In our comparison of Proofpoint vs. Webroot, Proofpoint is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
Webroot gives us the tools we need to be proactive in defending our clients from cyber attacks, and it is simple to setup and monitor. The support staff is also excellent, accommodating, and knowledgeable. Our only two criticisms are that updating software exceptions can occasionally be challenging and that, particularly in the healthcare sector, we still frequently need assistance from the support service.
Easy to deploy and monitor, proactive protection against threats
and fantastic support team
Difficulty in understanding how to update software exceptions
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
A very light endpoint security solution with a rapid deployment process. It doesn't need virus definition updates and can be set to interact with EDR systems, making it the best choice for small organizations with low resources. Furthermore, Webroot BEP interacts with the majority of Remote Monitoring and Management solutions, making deployment and upkeep simpler. If malware does infiltrate a system, Webroot BEP might be resource-intensive throughout the quarantine and cleanup phase.
Lightweight, quick to deploy and no need for virus definition updates
Can be resource intensive during quarantine and cleanup
Stopping spam and malicious emails, but requires continual training and user management. Wanted to use SPF, DKIM, and DMARC features but couldn't get help from support.
The system works well with regular training and use of quarantine and daily digest for suspect emails.
Lack of initial and ongoing training, difficult sales rep, and poor support after the person managing the system left.
It's a reliable product that delivers on its promises.
Great coverage against phishing, malware, impersonation, and business exploits
The documentation for Google Workspace is notably deficient. This led to complications during our go-live phase due to conflicting information. Additionally, it took 45 minutes to connect with a resource through P1 support.
Webroot gives us the tools we need to be proactive in defending our clients from cyber attacks, and it is simple to setup and monitor. The support staff is also excellent, accommodating, and knowledgeable. Our only two criticisms are that updating software exceptions can occasionally be challenging and that, particularly in the healthcare sector, we still frequently need assistance from the support service.
Easy to deploy and monitor, proactive protection against threats
and fantastic support team
Difficulty in understanding how to update software exceptions
A very light endpoint security solution with a rapid deployment process. It doesn't need virus definition updates and can be set to interact with EDR systems, making it the best choice for small organizations with low resources. Furthermore, Webroot BEP interacts with the majority of Remote Monitoring and Management solutions, making deployment and upkeep simpler. If malware does infiltrate a system, Webroot BEP might be resource-intensive throughout the quarantine and cleanup phase.
Lightweight, quick to deploy and no need for virus definition updates
Can be resource intensive during quarantine and cleanup
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Proofpoint vs. Webroot, Proofpoint has 15 user reviews and Webroot has 15. The average star rating for Proofpoint is 4.66 while Webroot has an average rating of 4.53. Proofpoint has more positive reviews than Webroot. Comparing Proofpoint vs. Webroot reviews, Proofpoint has stronger overall reviews.
Proofpoint vs. Webroot both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Cloud Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Application Management, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Proofpoint vs. Webroot, Proofpoint offers more of the most popular features and tools than Webroot.
In our pricing comparison of Proofpoint vs. Webroot, Webroot's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Webroot's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Proofpoint vs. Webroot shows that Webroot scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Proofpoint scores higher in , but Webroot has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
