In our comparison of Nucleus vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The product effectively helps me identify vulnerabilities and issues in applications and infrastructure. By providing solutions, it enables me to address these vulnerabilities and improve the security posture of our systems. The comprehensive tracking capabilities assist in proactively managing cyber risks.
I appreciate the multiple tracking options available in the product, including assets, compliance, vulnerabilities, risk factors, active vulnerabilities, top risks, and trends. These features allow me to stay on top of my application and infrastructure vulnerabilities effectively, supporting my role as a cyber ninja.
One drawback I've encountered is the inconvenience of filters. It would be beneficial to have a way to save filters for future use, as this would enhance efficiency and ease of use.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product provides observability and a centralized view of vulnerabilities across assets. The dashboard, equipped with numerous out-of-the-box filters, enables quick report generation and insights into all assets. The risk score feature is particularly helpful in prioritizing workloads.
I appreciate the vulnerability overview with different classifications and the ability to filter by environment and project. The interface is user-friendly, requiring minimal training. The template section is helpful for understanding different vulnerabilities and the CWSS score. Additionally, the ease of downloading asset lists in various formats and the centralized view of vulnerabilities and compliance are valuable features. The integration with SSO adds convenience.
While the documentation is good, providing university/academy classes to learn how to use the tool, especially for customization of reports and integration with enterprise tools, would be beneficial. Some minor enhancements to the preference section, such as retaining filters and scope, would also improve the user experience.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
The product effectively helps me identify vulnerabilities and issues in applications and infrastructure. By providing solutions, it enables me to address these vulnerabilities and improve the security posture of our systems. The comprehensive tracking capabilities assist in proactively managing cyber risks.
I appreciate the multiple tracking options available in the product, including assets, compliance, vulnerabilities, risk factors, active vulnerabilities, top risks, and trends. These features allow me to stay on top of my application and infrastructure vulnerabilities effectively, supporting my role as a cyber ninja.
One drawback I've encountered is the inconvenience of filters. It would be beneficial to have a way to save filters for future use, as this would enhance efficiency and ease of use.
The product provides observability and a centralized view of vulnerabilities across assets. The dashboard, equipped with numerous out-of-the-box filters, enables quick report generation and insights into all assets. The risk score feature is particularly helpful in prioritizing workloads.
I appreciate the vulnerability overview with different classifications and the ability to filter by environment and project. The interface is user-friendly, requiring minimal training. The template section is helpful for understanding different vulnerabilities and the CWSS score. Additionally, the ease of downloading asset lists in various formats and the centralized view of vulnerabilities and compliance are valuable features. The integration with SSO adds convenience.
While the documentation is good, providing university/academy classes to learn how to use the tool, especially for customization of reports and integration with enterprise tools, would be beneficial. Some minor enhancements to the preference section, such as retaining filters and scope, would also improve the user experience.
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Nucleus vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and Nucleus has 17. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while Nucleus has an average rating of 4.29. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than Nucleus. Comparing Nucleus vs. Perimeter 81 reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
Nucleus vs. Perimeter 81 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Network Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Device Management, Sync/Refresh, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Nucleus vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than Nucleus.
In our pricing comparison of Nucleus vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81's pricing starts at $8/month and is more affordable compared to Perimeter 81's starting cost of $8/month.
Our comparison of Nucleus vs. Perimeter 81 shows that Perimeter 81 scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support. Nucleus scores higher in learning curve, ease of admin, but Perimeter 81 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
