In our comparison of Microsoft Defender for Business vs. ThreatConnect, Microsoft Defender for Business is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Intune serves as an integral component of our organization-provided portal and integrates seamlessly with Office 365. This consolidation of essential features within a single EMS package streamlines our operations, enhancing overall efficiency.
Intune functions as a dedicated "play store" for our company, offering a seamless platform for viewing and installing apps, all while maintaining organizational control.
Azure Rights Management leaves room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Intune serves as an integral component of our organization-provided portal and integrates seamlessly with Office 365. This consolidation of essential features within a single EMS package streamlines our operations, enhancing overall efficiency.
Intune functions as a dedicated "play store" for our company, offering a seamless platform for viewing and installing apps, all while maintaining organizational control.
Azure Rights Management leaves room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Intune serves as an integral component of our organization-provided portal and integrates seamlessly with Office 365. This consolidation of essential features within a single EMS package streamlines our operations, enhancing overall efficiency.
Intune functions as a dedicated "play store" for our company, offering a seamless platform for viewing and installing apps, all while maintaining organizational control.
Azure Rights Management leaves room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness.
Intune serves as an integral component of our organization-provided portal and integrates seamlessly with Office 365. This consolidation of essential features within a single EMS package streamlines our operations, enhancing overall efficiency.
Intune functions as a dedicated "play store" for our company, offering a seamless platform for viewing and installing apps, all while maintaining organizational control.
Azure Rights Management leaves room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness.
For a small team, ThreatConnect proved effective in scaling and managing enterprise threat intelligence and threat hunting capabilities. However, as the complexity of Playbook design and integration increased, the software's potential was hindered, preventing the team from fully maximizing its benefits.
ThreatConnect offered the ability to gather, analyze, enhance, and distribute various types of data related to cybersecurity incidents and indicators of compromise across different customer environments. It allowed for tasks such as uploading a domain name, checking it against threat feeds, and enriching the data with additional information like news articles, reports, attribution, and determining the domain's prevalence across multiple client setups.
One of the drawbacks we encountered was the confusion and lack of proper documentation regarding the Playbooks that facilitated enrichment and integration with third-party tools like SIEM. The visual representation of coding concepts, where blocks were connected to one another, was intended to assist non-programmers in developing their capabilities. In reality, a more code-centric approach to Playbook development would have been more beneficial. We found ourselves with numerous questions and minimal guidance on how to address simple problems that could be easily tackled using Python.
Consider this risk management system that offers numerous possibilities for effortless detection of high-risk threats and a platform for record-keeping.
It is convenient for any company to efficiently prioritize potential high-risk issues. Additionally, it simplifies record maintenance, and ThreatConnect facilitates easy threat detection through actionable analysis.
There were no significant issues encountered during the implementation of ThreatConnect, and it even facilitated learning about the tools.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Microsoft Defender for Business vs. ThreatConnect, Microsoft Defender for Business has 2 user reviews and ThreatConnect has 2. The average star rating for Microsoft Defender for Business is 5 while ThreatConnect has an average rating of 3.5. Microsoft Defender for Business has more positive reviews than ThreatConnect. Comparing Microsoft Defender for Business vs. ThreatConnect reviews, Microsoft Defender for Business has stronger overall reviews.
Microsoft Defender for Business vs. ThreatConnect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Disaster Recovery, Systems/Administrative, Collaboration Tools, Integration Options, After-Sales Service, Content Management. In our feature comparison of Microsoft Defender for Business vs. ThreatConnect, Microsoft Defender for Business offers more of the most popular features and tools than ThreatConnect.
In our pricing comparison of Microsoft Defender for Business vs. ThreatConnect, ThreatConnect's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatConnect's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Microsoft Defender for Business vs. ThreatConnect shows that Microsoft Defender for Business scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements. ThreatConnect scores higher in learning curve, ease of admin, but Microsoft Defender for Business has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
