In our comparison of Lookout vs. QRadar SIEM, Lookout is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
It effectively identifies and defends against potential viruses, addressing a critical concern in mobile security.
Affordability and ease of access to the application.
I found the interface a bit cluttered and believe it could benefit from simplification to enhance user experience.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
Lookout has provided us with significant benefits by integrating all our mobile cybersecurity needs, data backups, device tracking, and more into one efficient platform. It has become an essential tool for every member of our organization, ensuring the security and protection of our devices and data.
I appreciate Lookout's comprehensive approach to cybersecurity, specifically its focus on mobile security to prevent various threats and cyber attacks. It impressed me how quickly we were able to set it up and adapt to its usage. Lookout operates seamlessly in the background without interfering with any activities, while keeping us informed and alerting us to any vulnerabilities, allowing us to take timely action and prevent damage.
The only drawback I found is that it is a paid application. However, the value it provides in efficiently fulfilling multiple cybersecurity and data-related functions within a single platform justifies the cost. It eliminates the need for using multiple applications to address different security needs.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
It effectively identifies and defends against potential viruses, addressing a critical concern in mobile security.
Affordability and ease of access to the application.
I found the interface a bit cluttered and believe it could benefit from simplification to enhance user experience.
Lookout has provided us with significant benefits by integrating all our mobile cybersecurity needs, data backups, device tracking, and more into one efficient platform. It has become an essential tool for every member of our organization, ensuring the security and protection of our devices and data.
I appreciate Lookout's comprehensive approach to cybersecurity, specifically its focus on mobile security to prevent various threats and cyber attacks. It impressed me how quickly we were able to set it up and adapt to its usage. Lookout operates seamlessly in the background without interfering with any activities, while keeping us informed and alerting us to any vulnerabilities, allowing us to take timely action and prevent damage.
The only drawback I found is that it is a paid application. However, the value it provides in efficiently fulfilling multiple cybersecurity and data-related functions within a single platform justifies the cost. It eliminates the need for using multiple applications to address different security needs.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Lookout vs. QRadar SIEM, Lookout has 27 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for Lookout is 4.66 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. Lookout has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing Lookout vs. QRadar SIEM reviews, Lookout has stronger overall reviews.
Lookout vs. QRadar SIEM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Disaster Recovery, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Integration Options, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Lookout vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than Lookout.
In our pricing comparison of Lookout vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to QRadar SIEM's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Lookout vs. QRadar SIEM shows that Lookout scores higher in usability for meets requirements, learning curve. QRadar SIEM scores higher in ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but Lookout has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
