In our comparison of Jamf Protect vs. ThreatLocker, Jamf Protect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Jamf Protect addresses the shortcomings of your previous campus endpoint security software, which was primarily designed for Windows machines. The software had numerous bugs and lacked support for important updates such as the new M1 processors from Apple. In contrast, Jamf Protect fills this gap and provides robust endpoint security specifically for Macs. This solution has resolved your security problems and ensured compatibility with the latest Apple processors.
The best aspect of Jamf Protect is that it actually works, unlike the endpoint security software your campus uses. While the other software failed to activate and didn't deliver results, Jamf Protect solved this problem effectively. This positive experience led to switching to Jamf Protect for your Mac fleet.
So far, you haven't found anything to dislike about Jamf Protect. The ease of setup and reliable performance contribute to your satisfaction. It seems unlikely that you will encounter any significant issues or drawbacks.
N/A
Jamf Protect tackles several crucial challenges by enabling administrators to record behaviors, prevent malicious activities from executing, and gain valuable insights based on CIS benchmarks. These features contribute to enhanced security, proactive threat prevention, and comprehensive resource management.
Jamf Protect provides administrators with an exceptional level of insight into the computer resources of the company, surpassing what other solutions offer. This unique perspective is invaluable for effective management and security.
While the initial configuration process can be a bit cumbersome, the seamless deployment when integrating with Jamf Pro makes up for it. The combination of the two solutions simplifies the setup and enhances the overall experience.
N/A
Jamf Protect addresses the shortcomings of your previous campus endpoint security software, which was primarily designed for Windows machines. The software had numerous bugs and lacked support for important updates such as the new M1 processors from Apple. In contrast, Jamf Protect fills this gap and provides robust endpoint security specifically for Macs. This solution has resolved your security problems and ensured compatibility with the latest Apple processors.
The best aspect of Jamf Protect is that it actually works, unlike the endpoint security software your campus uses. While the other software failed to activate and didn't deliver results, Jamf Protect solved this problem effectively. This positive experience led to switching to Jamf Protect for your Mac fleet.
So far, you haven't found anything to dislike about Jamf Protect. The ease of setup and reliable performance contribute to your satisfaction. It seems unlikely that you will encounter any significant issues or drawbacks.
Jamf Protect tackles several crucial challenges by enabling administrators to record behaviors, prevent malicious activities from executing, and gain valuable insights based on CIS benchmarks. These features contribute to enhanced security, proactive threat prevention, and comprehensive resource management.
Jamf Protect provides administrators with an exceptional level of insight into the computer resources of the company, surpassing what other solutions offer. This unique perspective is invaluable for effective management and security.
While the initial configuration process can be a bit cumbersome, the seamless deployment when integrating with Jamf Pro makes up for it. The combination of the two solutions simplifies the setup and enhances the overall experience.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Jamf Protect vs. ThreatLocker, Jamf Protect has 16 user reviews and ThreatLocker has 0. The average star rating for Jamf Protect is 4.62 while ThreatLocker has an average rating of 0.0. Jamf Protect has more positive reviews than ThreatLocker. Comparing Jamf Protect vs. ThreatLocker reviews, Jamf Protect has stronger overall reviews.
Jamf Protect vs. ThreatLocker both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Network Management, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Systems/Administrative, After-Sales Service, Reminders/Alerts. In our feature comparison of Jamf Protect vs. ThreatLocker, ThreatLocker offers more of the most popular features and tools than Jamf Protect.
In our pricing comparison of Jamf Protect vs. ThreatLocker, ThreatLocker's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatLocker's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Jamf Protect vs. ThreatLocker shows that Jamf Protect scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. ThreatLocker scores higher in , but Jamf Protect has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
