In our comparison of Integrate vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
N/A
Using it is simple, having updated technology is easy, and it is ideal for leads purchases and sales.
When linking to sellers and buyers, it is at times slow.
We can now automate our marketing roles and have a wider view into our ROI on the said roles thanks to SharpSpring
Centrally collaborating a vast variety of marketing and sales features is possible.
An aspect to put a tracking code is lacking in the social planner.
Integrate won us over with its seamless integration capabilities, making it a breeze to connect our Salesforce system and later transition to linking our Marketo database. The process was notably smooth and contributed to the efficiency of our operations.
The platform addresses specific needs, providing robust support throughout the integration process.
One area of improvement lies in the clarity of error messages, particularly during integration mappings.
Automating organizations selling activities is possible courtesy of SarpSpring.
Has a relatively tiny learning curve at the beginning
Implementing some functions is a process.
Using it is simple, having updated technology is easy, and it is ideal for leads purchases and sales.
When linking to sellers and buyers, it is at times slow.
Integrate won us over with its seamless integration capabilities, making it a breeze to connect our Salesforce system and later transition to linking our Marketo database. The process was notably smooth and contributed to the efficiency of our operations.
The platform addresses specific needs, providing robust support throughout the integration process.
One area of improvement lies in the clarity of error messages, particularly during integration mappings.
We can now automate our marketing roles and have a wider view into our ROI on the said roles thanks to SharpSpring
Centrally collaborating a vast variety of marketing and sales features is possible.
An aspect to put a tracking code is lacking in the social planner.
Automating organizations selling activities is possible courtesy of SarpSpring.
Has a relatively tiny learning curve at the beginning
Implementing some functions is a process.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Integrate vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring has 294 user reviews and Integrate has 8. The average star rating for SharpSpring is 4.63 while Integrate has an average rating of 4. SharpSpring has more positive reviews than Integrate. Comparing Integrate vs. SharpSpring reviews, SharpSpring has stronger overall reviews.
Integrate vs. SharpSpring both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Customer Management, Reporting & Analytics, Supported Channels, User Calls-to-Action, Chat/IM Management, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Customizable Items, Systems/Administrative, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Integrate vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring offers more of the most popular features and tools than Integrate.
In our pricing comparison of Integrate vs. SharpSpring, SharpSpring's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to SharpSpring's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of Integrate vs. SharpSpring shows that SharpSpring scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Integrate scores higher in , but SharpSpring has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
