In our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Yellowfin, IBM Planning Analytics is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
N/A
* Vendor does not share prices.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
More than 40 customers are using Yellowfin, all gave a positive feedback.
Wonderful app to work with.
Cheap, easy, variety of data sources, connectors to dashboards.
Some issues like that of release and bugs.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
The product enables us to create all types of reports (big data and statistical) for our software platform, allowing us to quickly provide customized reports to our clients."
The product's strength lies in its flexibility in terms of customizing content fields and having a wide selection of pre-defined content with the option to expand through more technical means.
The product requires more resources with every update, making it challenging for small businesses to manage costs, which can result in performance impacts.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
More than 40 customers are using Yellowfin, all gave a positive feedback.
Wonderful app to work with.
Cheap, easy, variety of data sources, connectors to dashboards.
Some issues like that of release and bugs.
The product enables us to create all types of reports (big data and statistical) for our software platform, allowing us to quickly provide customized reports to our clients."
The product's strength lies in its flexibility in terms of customizing content fields and having a wide selection of pre-defined content with the option to expand through more technical means.
The product requires more resources with every update, making it challenging for small businesses to manage costs, which can result in performance impacts.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Yellowfin, Yellowfin has 18 user reviews and IBM Planning Analytics has 31. The average star rating for Yellowfin is 4.38 while IBM Planning Analytics has an average rating of 4.35. Yellowfin has more positive reviews than IBM Planning Analytics. Comparing IBM Planning Analytics vs. Yellowfin reviews, Yellowfin has stronger overall reviews.
IBM Planning Analytics vs. Yellowfin both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, File Management, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, After-Sales Service, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Yellowfin, Yellowfin offers more of the most popular features and tools than IBM Planning Analytics.
In our pricing comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Yellowfin, Yellowfin's pricing starts at 0/month and is more affordable compared to Yellowfin's starting cost of 0/month.
Our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Yellowfin shows that Yellowfin scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in , but Yellowfin has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
