In our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Sisense, Sisense is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
With this product, we are able to present our customers with important revenue insights, leading to increased earnings for our customers."
The ability to customize the product according to our needs.
The product does not adequately prevent users from taking actions that are recommended to be avoided.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Our organization created a white-labeled and OEM edition of Sisense offering radical analytics mainly for retail corporations in Brazil. We are fast developing and able to satisfactorily serve our clients thanks to Sisense.
Very scalable, making and publishing progressive models of data and dashboards is very easy, creating a data warehouse that is external and costly or using extra ETL tools is not necessary, exceptional support, pre-aggregating data isn’t necessary, and the software’s performance is high with many tables and loads of data.
Sisense could be better in terms of releasing the latest functionalities and editions after every four months.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
With this product, we are able to present our customers with important revenue insights, leading to increased earnings for our customers."
The ability to customize the product according to our needs.
The product does not adequately prevent users from taking actions that are recommended to be avoided.
Our organization created a white-labeled and OEM edition of Sisense offering radical analytics mainly for retail corporations in Brazil. We are fast developing and able to satisfactorily serve our clients thanks to Sisense.
Very scalable, making and publishing progressive models of data and dashboards is very easy, creating a data warehouse that is external and costly or using extra ETL tools is not necessary, exceptional support, pre-aggregating data isn’t necessary, and the software’s performance is high with many tables and loads of data.
Sisense could be better in terms of releasing the latest functionalities and editions after every four months.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Sisense, Sisense has 63 user reviews and IBM Planning Analytics has 31. The average star rating for Sisense is 4.53 while IBM Planning Analytics has an average rating of 4.35. Sisense has more positive reviews than IBM Planning Analytics. Comparing IBM Planning Analytics vs. Sisense reviews, Sisense has stronger overall reviews.
IBM Planning Analytics vs. Sisense both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Sisense, IBM Planning Analytics offers more of the most popular features and tools than Sisense.
In our pricing comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Sisense, Sisense's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Sisense's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. Sisense shows that Sisense scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in , but Sisense has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
