In our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. MicroStrategy ONE, IBM Planning Analytics is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
I greatly loved the ease of use.
Very simple to use and make impromptu reports, ability to dispatch reports to my customers or those that I assisted to offer them a nice view of their business.
Trusting the data was difficult because by doing so, then whatever the software can perform becomes mute/hushed.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Capability to run tailored reports that assist me in comprehending how my employees are conducting themselves on phone, and exporting that data is simple.
Weak integration of help functions, quite scary for novices.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
Experience in building complex models: The user has successfully built complex models in TM1 for both management and statutory accounts. They have applied TM1 in diverse areas such as property valuations, ship building project costing, airline route profitability, currency conversion, activity-based costing, and public finance initiative scenario comparison.
Real-time data consolidation: TM1 allows for real-time consolidation of data, enabling users to see the immediate impact of changes made to budget figures at different levels of the hierarchy. Calculations defined in TM1's rules language can be applied to related values, ensuring accurate and up-to-date results.
Limitations of Planning Analytics Workbench (PAW): The user mentions that PAW may not match the capabilities of Power BI when it comes to dashboarding. However, TM1's modeling and planning capabilities are considered superior to those of Power BI.
I greatly loved the ease of use.
Very simple to use and make impromptu reports, ability to dispatch reports to my customers or those that I assisted to offer them a nice view of their business.
Trusting the data was difficult because by doing so, then whatever the software can perform becomes mute/hushed.
Capability to run tailored reports that assist me in comprehending how my employees are conducting themselves on phone, and exporting that data is simple.
Weak integration of help functions, quite scary for novices.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. MicroStrategy ONE, IBM Planning Analytics has 31 user reviews and MicroStrategy ONE has 25. The average star rating for IBM Planning Analytics is 4.35 while MicroStrategy ONE has an average rating of 4.2. IBM Planning Analytics has more positive reviews than MicroStrategy ONE. Comparing IBM Planning Analytics vs. MicroStrategy ONE reviews, IBM Planning Analytics has stronger overall reviews.
IBM Planning Analytics vs. MicroStrategy ONE both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Data Management, Data Migration, Report Management, Reporting & Analytics, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Layout Types, Chart Types, Customizable Items, Appointments/Scheduling, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. MicroStrategy ONE, IBM Planning Analytics offers more of the most popular features and tools than MicroStrategy ONE.
In our pricing comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. MicroStrategy ONE, MicroStrategy ONE's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to MicroStrategy ONE's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of IBM Planning Analytics vs. MicroStrategy ONE shows that IBM Planning Analytics scores higher in usability for meets requirements. MicroStrategy ONE scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but IBM Planning Analytics has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
