In our comparison of Google Cloud vs. Vultr, Vultr is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Overall, Google Cloud Storage solves many problems for my team. It allows us to access, collaborate, and ingest various data sets into analytics solutions on Google Cloud, which frees us up to focus on the business solution rather than technology resources or infrastructure.
I really appreciate the efficiency of Google Cloud Storage. It allows me to easily store and access my data sets from anywhere, which is incredibly convenient. I also love how seamlessly it integrates with other Google cloud services and data analytics solutions like Google Cloud Big Query. Managing my data through the service user interface is also a breeze.
If I had to mention one thing that could be improved, it would be Google Cloud Storage's file search/index capabilities. When I have many files, it can take a bit longer to find what I'm looking for. Additionally, I would love it if the service was a bit more affordable.
Pricing, performance, and support are all good about Vultr. Exporting VPS images would be nice, as would a reduction in infrequent reboots. My Elasticsearch cluster and I/O-intensive applications benefit from Vultr's affordable high-performance SSD hosting.
Easy to use, competitively priced, stable performance, knowledgable customer support team, SSD hosting, elastisearch, helpful in-built applications and tools
Unable to export VPS images
Offers robust data analytics and storage capabilities, effortless collaboration options, portability, and high reliability. It also ensures top-notch data security for both uploading and downloading.
Provides a variety of storage sizes, allows unlimited uploading and downloading, enables sharing of any file size with anyone, and provides easy remote access even for larger files.
I have no dislikes as all features are impressive
I found it incredibly simple to set up and operate my virtual machines on Vultr. The entire process was quite smooth and took only a few minutes. But Vultr is not the most affordable option available.
Simple configuration and setup process, good value for money, allows VMs to run on the cloud
Cheaper alternatives available
Overall, Google Cloud Storage solves many problems for my team. It allows us to access, collaborate, and ingest various data sets into analytics solutions on Google Cloud, which frees us up to focus on the business solution rather than technology resources or infrastructure.
I really appreciate the efficiency of Google Cloud Storage. It allows me to easily store and access my data sets from anywhere, which is incredibly convenient. I also love how seamlessly it integrates with other Google cloud services and data analytics solutions like Google Cloud Big Query. Managing my data through the service user interface is also a breeze.
If I had to mention one thing that could be improved, it would be Google Cloud Storage's file search/index capabilities. When I have many files, it can take a bit longer to find what I'm looking for. Additionally, I would love it if the service was a bit more affordable.
Offers robust data analytics and storage capabilities, effortless collaboration options, portability, and high reliability. It also ensures top-notch data security for both uploading and downloading.
Provides a variety of storage sizes, allows unlimited uploading and downloading, enables sharing of any file size with anyone, and provides easy remote access even for larger files.
I have no dislikes as all features are impressive
Pricing, performance, and support are all good about Vultr. Exporting VPS images would be nice, as would a reduction in infrequent reboots. My Elasticsearch cluster and I/O-intensive applications benefit from Vultr's affordable high-performance SSD hosting.
Easy to use, competitively priced, stable performance, knowledgable customer support team, SSD hosting, elastisearch, helpful in-built applications and tools
Unable to export VPS images
I found it incredibly simple to set up and operate my virtual machines on Vultr. The entire process was quite smooth and took only a few minutes. But Vultr is not the most affordable option available.
Simple configuration and setup process, good value for money, allows VMs to run on the cloud
Cheaper alternatives available
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Google Cloud vs. Vultr, Google Cloud has 8 user reviews and Vultr has 11. The average star rating for Google Cloud is 4.75 while Vultr has an average rating of 4.27. Google Cloud has more positive reviews than Vultr. Comparing Google Cloud vs. Vultr reviews, Google Cloud has stronger overall reviews.
Google Cloud vs. Vultr both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cloud Management, Network Management, Content Management, Application Management, Container Management, Supported Devices/Hardware, Resource Management, Asset Management, Systems/Administrative, Reporting & Analytics, Project Management Features, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Supported Technologies, Compliance Accreditations, Disaster Recovery, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Google Cloud vs. Vultr, Vultr offers more of the most popular features and tools than Google Cloud.
In our pricing comparison of Google Cloud vs. Vultr, Vultr's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Vultr's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Google Cloud vs. Vultr shows that Vultr scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support. Google Cloud scores higher in learning curve, ease of admin, but Vultr has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
