In our comparison of Epic vs. WebPT, Epic is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
WebPT is used by speech-language pathologists, occupational practitioners, and physiotherapists. It is accessible from anywhere using any internet-connected device, making it simple to take notes and record patient progress. Additionally incredibly user-friendly and simple to use is WebPT. Both readers and therapists will find the arrangement to be comfortable and helpful. Additionally, the program provides strong billing and insurance tools that make it simple to submit claims and keep track of payments. Users complain that WebPT prevents them from simultaneously using two devices. If your clinic has several PCs, this may be difficult.
Available on any device with internet, user friendly, ergonomic layout and streamlines note writing
No way to be notified of incomplete fields and same user on two devices at once is not possible
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
I can access my patients' medical records using this software from anywhere in the globe, and it gives me access to real-time data, past results, and therapy administration. I have easy access to their medical history and can even visit their residences. For providing individualized treatment, the application's capacity to be accessed from my own devices outside of the workplace is crucial. But since I can't access a local database, I have to rely on internet access, which makes it challenging to contact patients who live far away. It can also be annoying to deal with the intricate and initially difficult graphical interface.
Accessibility, excellent data transfer rates,flexibility
Internet dependence, complex interface, mobile version limitations
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
WebPT is used by speech-language pathologists, occupational practitioners, and physiotherapists. It is accessible from anywhere using any internet-connected device, making it simple to take notes and record patient progress. Additionally incredibly user-friendly and simple to use is WebPT. Both readers and therapists will find the arrangement to be comfortable and helpful. Additionally, the program provides strong billing and insurance tools that make it simple to submit claims and keep track of payments. Users complain that WebPT prevents them from simultaneously using two devices. If your clinic has several PCs, this may be difficult.
Available on any device with internet, user friendly, ergonomic layout and streamlines note writing
No way to be notified of incomplete fields and same user on two devices at once is not possible
I can access my patients' medical records using this software from anywhere in the globe, and it gives me access to real-time data, past results, and therapy administration. I have easy access to their medical history and can even visit their residences. For providing individualized treatment, the application's capacity to be accessed from my own devices outside of the workplace is crucial. But since I can't access a local database, I have to rely on internet access, which makes it challenging to contact patients who live far away. It can also be annoying to deal with the intricate and initially difficult graphical interface.
Accessibility, excellent data transfer rates,flexibility
Internet dependence, complex interface, mobile version limitations
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Epic vs. WebPT, Epic has 75 user reviews and WebPT has 18. The average star rating for Epic is 4.49 while WebPT has an average rating of 4. Epic has more positive reviews than WebPT. Comparing Epic vs. WebPT reviews, Epic has stronger overall reviews.
Epic vs. WebPT both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, File Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of Epic vs. WebPT, Epic offers more of the most popular features and tools than WebPT.
In our pricing comparison of Epic vs. WebPT, WebPT's pricing starts at $3/month and is more affordable compared to WebPT's starting cost of $3/month.
Our comparison of Epic vs. WebPT shows that Epic scores higher in usability for meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin. WebPT scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, quality of support, but Epic has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
