In our comparison of Epic vs. Praxis, Epic is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
As a psychiatrist, having an EMR that doesn't disrupt my patient interactions and enables me to complete notes promptly is essential, and Praxis delivers on these fronts.
Unlike other EMRs I've encountered, Praxis offers an open template that allows me to create notes in my own unique way, rather than relying on rigid drop-down menus and checkboxes.
I primarily use it for my specialty, so I may not be leveraging all its capabilities.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
EMR’s interface is straightforward. Installing it as you desire needs some time since it has lesser templates. Hopefully, upgrades and enhancements continue.
Simple to learn and follow, very well-arranged, has amazing features, it is quite easy to chart, and its UI is neat and straightforward.
Familiarizing with the system took a while- some features are poorly arranged, compared to bigger EMRs the adjustments and upgrades are a bit less, and installing every template was time consuming as note templates aren’t widespread.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
As a psychiatrist, having an EMR that doesn't disrupt my patient interactions and enables me to complete notes promptly is essential, and Praxis delivers on these fronts.
Unlike other EMRs I've encountered, Praxis offers an open template that allows me to create notes in my own unique way, rather than relying on rigid drop-down menus and checkboxes.
I primarily use it for my specialty, so I may not be leveraging all its capabilities.
EMR’s interface is straightforward. Installing it as you desire needs some time since it has lesser templates. Hopefully, upgrades and enhancements continue.
Simple to learn and follow, very well-arranged, has amazing features, it is quite easy to chart, and its UI is neat and straightforward.
Familiarizing with the system took a while- some features are poorly arranged, compared to bigger EMRs the adjustments and upgrades are a bit less, and installing every template was time consuming as note templates aren’t widespread.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Epic vs. Praxis, Praxis has 33 user reviews and Epic has 75. The average star rating for Praxis is 5 while Epic has an average rating of 4.49. Praxis has more positive reviews than Epic. Comparing Epic vs. Praxis reviews, Praxis has stronger overall reviews.
Epic vs. Praxis both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, File Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of Epic vs. Praxis, Praxis offers more of the most popular features and tools than Epic.
In our pricing comparison of Epic vs. Praxis, Praxis's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Praxis's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Epic vs. Praxis shows that Epic scores higher in usability for learning curve, setup & support. Praxis scores higher in ease of use, meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin, but Epic has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
