In our comparison of Epic vs. MicroMD, MicroMD is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
It is better than many other medical clinics or health provider support software or service. You can manage all your client-related information including billing, etc., from this system. It is not too expensive an option.
The web-based solution can be made more user-friendly. Some of the technical names are not exact, but recognizable.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
Trying this software is worth it. For expert physicians and specialized support, it functions well.
Using it online is easy, has great client service-helpful.
Connectivity problems due to internet downtime.
The enhanced features for research in this system (e.g. the ability to get to records from other agencies which wok with EPIC) are the reason why we’re continuously using it. Regarding research, invoicing and compliance, this software has been of great help.
The features that improve the ability to perform research in an educational hospital are present in EPIC. To make sure that the right fees are passed to the research study/insurance, there are methods to generate lists of patients, monitor billing, and get tailored alerts. Running reports after determining and monitoring participation and advancement of research is simple.
Some research aspects are non-intuitive. Picking up a few back end reporting systems takes time due to the learning curve present.
Epic Care has a relevant interface suited for the clinical environment and a set up that is rather simple with the new layout with tab sections for the clinician. It coordinates the work and keeps continuity in the facility. Also, it helps to find out how much work still needs to be completed. It is also an important development that our institution is employing a new version which would create a flawless evenness between outpatient and inpatient.
There are no cons as such but a suggestion that EPIC should develop new ways that clinicians can come out with that would help them showcase their own unique skills based on their specialty. It may look difficult in the beginning. But, this way there will be an improvement in clinical efficiency.
It is better than many other medical clinics or health provider support software or service. You can manage all your client-related information including billing, etc., from this system. It is not too expensive an option.
The web-based solution can be made more user-friendly. Some of the technical names are not exact, but recognizable.
Trying this software is worth it. For expert physicians and specialized support, it functions well.
Using it online is easy, has great client service-helpful.
Connectivity problems due to internet downtime.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Epic vs. MicroMD, Epic has 75 user reviews and MicroMD has 11. The average star rating for Epic is 4.49 while MicroMD has an average rating of 4.36. Epic has more positive reviews than MicroMD. Comparing Epic vs. MicroMD reviews, Epic has stronger overall reviews.
Epic vs. MicroMD both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Medical Practice Management Features, Patient Management, eRX, Medical Charting, Laboratory Management, Insurance Claim Management, Accounting Features, Cash Flow Management, Portal Types, Customizable Items, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, After-Sales Service, Medical Specialties. In our feature comparison of Epic vs. MicroMD, MicroMD offers more of the most popular features and tools than Epic.
In our pricing comparison of Epic vs. MicroMD, MicroMD's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to MicroMD's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Epic vs. MicroMD shows that MicroMD scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support. Epic scores higher in quality of support, ease of admin, but MicroMD has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
