In our comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. ThreatLocker, CylanceENDPOINT is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
This cybersecurity solution is excellent, in my opinion. It offers thorough coverage for a range of operating systems and is simple to install and maintain across a big network of devices. A significant benefit is the simplicity with which whitelists can be established up and mass quarantined. Reporting on and keeping an eye on malware families and threat patterns is made simple by the intuitive console. But occasionally, the script module might generate false positives, and if you're not careful, handling exceptions can be challenging. Real-time sandbox features are something else I would want to see included in the product.
Easy to deploy and manage policies, has coverage for various OS platforms, bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat and user friendly console for reporting
No real-time sandbox capabilities and false positive for the script module and could get tricky
N/A
n/a
CylanceProtect has consistently been regarded as the top choice for endpoint protection in the market. It offers exceptional security for both Windows and Mac endpoints, delivering outstanding protection.
However, since its acquisition by Blackberry in 2019, the integration of the two companies has been somewhat clumsy. While the Cylance website dashboard was clean and user-friendly, the Blackberry website design feels outdated. Additionally, there have been delays in releasing the endpoint client for Mac OS Big Sur, which should have been available earlier with Catalina. The frequent false positives for Adobe CS updates have also been a source of frustration. As our licensing is set to expire next summer, I will be exploring alternative options
N/A
This cybersecurity solution is excellent, in my opinion. It offers thorough coverage for a range of operating systems and is simple to install and maintain across a big network of devices. A significant benefit is the simplicity with which whitelists can be established up and mass quarantined. Reporting on and keeping an eye on malware families and threat patterns is made simple by the intuitive console. But occasionally, the script module might generate false positives, and if you're not careful, handling exceptions can be challenging. Real-time sandbox features are something else I would want to see included in the product.
Easy to deploy and manage policies, has coverage for various OS platforms, bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat and user friendly console for reporting
No real-time sandbox capabilities and false positive for the script module and could get tricky
n/a
CylanceProtect has consistently been regarded as the top choice for endpoint protection in the market. It offers exceptional security for both Windows and Mac endpoints, delivering outstanding protection.
However, since its acquisition by Blackberry in 2019, the integration of the two companies has been somewhat clumsy. While the Cylance website dashboard was clean and user-friendly, the Blackberry website design feels outdated. Additionally, there have been delays in releasing the endpoint client for Mac OS Big Sur, which should have been available earlier with Catalina. The frequent false positives for Adobe CS updates have also been a source of frustration. As our licensing is set to expire next summer, I will be exploring alternative options
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. ThreatLocker, CylanceENDPOINT has 10 user reviews and ThreatLocker has 0. The average star rating for CylanceENDPOINT is 4 while ThreatLocker has an average rating of 0.0. CylanceENDPOINT has more positive reviews than ThreatLocker. Comparing CylanceENDPOINT vs. ThreatLocker reviews, CylanceENDPOINT has stronger overall reviews.
CylanceENDPOINT vs. ThreatLocker both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Network Management, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Systems/Administrative, After-Sales Service, Reminders/Alerts. In our feature comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. ThreatLocker, ThreatLocker offers more of the most popular features and tools than CylanceENDPOINT.
In our pricing comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. ThreatLocker, ThreatLocker's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatLocker's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. ThreatLocker shows that CylanceENDPOINT scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. ThreatLocker scores higher in , but CylanceENDPOINT has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
