In our comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Jamf Protect, Jamf Protect is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
This cybersecurity solution is excellent, in my opinion. It offers thorough coverage for a range of operating systems and is simple to install and maintain across a big network of devices. A significant benefit is the simplicity with which whitelists can be established up and mass quarantined. Reporting on and keeping an eye on malware families and threat patterns is made simple by the intuitive console. But occasionally, the script module might generate false positives, and if you're not careful, handling exceptions can be challenging. Real-time sandbox features are something else I would want to see included in the product.
Easy to deploy and manage policies, has coverage for various OS platforms, bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat and user friendly console for reporting
No real-time sandbox capabilities and false positive for the script module and could get tricky
Jamf Protect addresses the shortcomings of your previous campus endpoint security software, which was primarily designed for Windows machines. The software had numerous bugs and lacked support for important updates such as the new M1 processors from Apple. In contrast, Jamf Protect fills this gap and provides robust endpoint security specifically for Macs. This solution has resolved your security problems and ensured compatibility with the latest Apple processors.
The best aspect of Jamf Protect is that it actually works, unlike the endpoint security software your campus uses. While the other software failed to activate and didn't deliver results, Jamf Protect solved this problem effectively. This positive experience led to switching to Jamf Protect for your Mac fleet.
So far, you haven't found anything to dislike about Jamf Protect. The ease of setup and reliable performance contribute to your satisfaction. It seems unlikely that you will encounter any significant issues or drawbacks.
n/a
CylanceProtect has consistently been regarded as the top choice for endpoint protection in the market. It offers exceptional security for both Windows and Mac endpoints, delivering outstanding protection.
However, since its acquisition by Blackberry in 2019, the integration of the two companies has been somewhat clumsy. While the Cylance website dashboard was clean and user-friendly, the Blackberry website design feels outdated. Additionally, there have been delays in releasing the endpoint client for Mac OS Big Sur, which should have been available earlier with Catalina. The frequent false positives for Adobe CS updates have also been a source of frustration. As our licensing is set to expire next summer, I will be exploring alternative options
Jamf Protect tackles several crucial challenges by enabling administrators to record behaviors, prevent malicious activities from executing, and gain valuable insights based on CIS benchmarks. These features contribute to enhanced security, proactive threat prevention, and comprehensive resource management.
Jamf Protect provides administrators with an exceptional level of insight into the computer resources of the company, surpassing what other solutions offer. This unique perspective is invaluable for effective management and security.
While the initial configuration process can be a bit cumbersome, the seamless deployment when integrating with Jamf Pro makes up for it. The combination of the two solutions simplifies the setup and enhances the overall experience.
This cybersecurity solution is excellent, in my opinion. It offers thorough coverage for a range of operating systems and is simple to install and maintain across a big network of devices. A significant benefit is the simplicity with which whitelists can be established up and mass quarantined. Reporting on and keeping an eye on malware families and threat patterns is made simple by the intuitive console. But occasionally, the script module might generate false positives, and if you're not careful, handling exceptions can be challenging. Real-time sandbox features are something else I would want to see included in the product.
Easy to deploy and manage policies, has coverage for various OS platforms, bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat and user friendly console for reporting
No real-time sandbox capabilities and false positive for the script module and could get tricky
n/a
CylanceProtect has consistently been regarded as the top choice for endpoint protection in the market. It offers exceptional security for both Windows and Mac endpoints, delivering outstanding protection.
However, since its acquisition by Blackberry in 2019, the integration of the two companies has been somewhat clumsy. While the Cylance website dashboard was clean and user-friendly, the Blackberry website design feels outdated. Additionally, there have been delays in releasing the endpoint client for Mac OS Big Sur, which should have been available earlier with Catalina. The frequent false positives for Adobe CS updates have also been a source of frustration. As our licensing is set to expire next summer, I will be exploring alternative options
Jamf Protect addresses the shortcomings of your previous campus endpoint security software, which was primarily designed for Windows machines. The software had numerous bugs and lacked support for important updates such as the new M1 processors from Apple. In contrast, Jamf Protect fills this gap and provides robust endpoint security specifically for Macs. This solution has resolved your security problems and ensured compatibility with the latest Apple processors.
The best aspect of Jamf Protect is that it actually works, unlike the endpoint security software your campus uses. While the other software failed to activate and didn't deliver results, Jamf Protect solved this problem effectively. This positive experience led to switching to Jamf Protect for your Mac fleet.
So far, you haven't found anything to dislike about Jamf Protect. The ease of setup and reliable performance contribute to your satisfaction. It seems unlikely that you will encounter any significant issues or drawbacks.
Jamf Protect tackles several crucial challenges by enabling administrators to record behaviors, prevent malicious activities from executing, and gain valuable insights based on CIS benchmarks. These features contribute to enhanced security, proactive threat prevention, and comprehensive resource management.
Jamf Protect provides administrators with an exceptional level of insight into the computer resources of the company, surpassing what other solutions offer. This unique perspective is invaluable for effective management and security.
While the initial configuration process can be a bit cumbersome, the seamless deployment when integrating with Jamf Pro makes up for it. The combination of the two solutions simplifies the setup and enhances the overall experience.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Jamf Protect, Jamf Protect has 16 user reviews and CylanceENDPOINT has 10. The average star rating for Jamf Protect is 4.62 while CylanceENDPOINT has an average rating of 4. Jamf Protect has more positive reviews than CylanceENDPOINT. Comparing CylanceENDPOINT vs. Jamf Protect reviews, Jamf Protect has stronger overall reviews.
CylanceENDPOINT vs. Jamf Protect both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Workflow Automation, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Third-Party Integrations, Integration Options, Compliance Accreditations, Supported Technologies, After-Sales Service, Customizable Items, Reminders/Alerts. In our feature comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Jamf Protect, Jamf Protect offers more of the most popular features and tools than CylanceENDPOINT.
In our pricing comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Jamf Protect, Jamf Protect's pricing starts at $12/month and is more affordable compared to Jamf Protect's starting cost of $12/month.
Our comparison of CylanceENDPOINT vs. Jamf Protect shows that CylanceENDPOINT scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. Jamf Protect scores higher in , but CylanceENDPOINT has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.