In our comparison of CyberArk vs. OneLogin, CyberArk is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
For the PAS application, its scalability and redundancy options are outstanding. Adding another server behind the load balancer is a breeze. Regarding the EPM application, its high adjustability and flexibility make it suitable for a wide range of uses.
It has seamlessly transitioned into our production and infrastructure workflows after strong adoption by our R&D team.
PAS Application: The CPM component lacks easy scalability. Performance issues arise with large deployments. Requests may fail or not execute with a large pool of data.
OneLogin has undoubtedly enhanced our organization's security posture, but there are moments when the tradeoff between security and convenience can feel like a bit of a hurdle to overcome.
Ability to streamline access to a suite of internal tools. The integration with Slack is impressive.
Reminder to always remember your password, as there's little room for shortcuts.
The product effectively solves the challenge of integrating Cyberark with internal applications, allowing for session monitoring and identifying any unauthorized activity. It also facilitates onboarding of accounts and safes to streamline server administration tasks within the tool.
One of the standout features I like is the Privileged Session Manager (PSM) which allows monitoring of user connectivity in the backend. Additionally, the Central Policy Manager (CPM) is excellent for handling password management across required and pre-defined platforms.
One potential drawback is that beginners may find it challenging to start working with and learning the tool. However, once familiarized, it offers a great platform for development and exploration.
We use OneLogin as a portal to many of our different company platforms.
OneLogin is very convenient as we can avoid logging into many programs while working. Its the dashboard is so designed that you can see all the accounts that you use. But you can also view the accounts of the entire company.
The mobile app is disappointing. It is difficult to switch between tasks. Even though the OneLogin app is for the mobile, it will not take the user to a mobile-friendly version of the program.
For the PAS application, its scalability and redundancy options are outstanding. Adding another server behind the load balancer is a breeze. Regarding the EPM application, its high adjustability and flexibility make it suitable for a wide range of uses.
It has seamlessly transitioned into our production and infrastructure workflows after strong adoption by our R&D team.
PAS Application: The CPM component lacks easy scalability. Performance issues arise with large deployments. Requests may fail or not execute with a large pool of data.
The product effectively solves the challenge of integrating Cyberark with internal applications, allowing for session monitoring and identifying any unauthorized activity. It also facilitates onboarding of accounts and safes to streamline server administration tasks within the tool.
One of the standout features I like is the Privileged Session Manager (PSM) which allows monitoring of user connectivity in the backend. Additionally, the Central Policy Manager (CPM) is excellent for handling password management across required and pre-defined platforms.
One potential drawback is that beginners may find it challenging to start working with and learning the tool. However, once familiarized, it offers a great platform for development and exploration.
OneLogin has undoubtedly enhanced our organization's security posture, but there are moments when the tradeoff between security and convenience can feel like a bit of a hurdle to overcome.
Ability to streamline access to a suite of internal tools. The integration with Slack is impressive.
Reminder to always remember your password, as there's little room for shortcuts.
We use OneLogin as a portal to many of our different company platforms.
OneLogin is very convenient as we can avoid logging into many programs while working. Its the dashboard is so designed that you can see all the accounts that you use. But you can also view the accounts of the entire company.
The mobile app is disappointing. It is difficult to switch between tasks. Even though the OneLogin app is for the mobile, it will not take the user to a mobile-friendly version of the program.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of CyberArk vs. OneLogin, OneLogin has 33 user reviews and CyberArk has 9. The average star rating for OneLogin is 4.60 while CyberArk has an average rating of 4.22. OneLogin has more positive reviews than CyberArk. Comparing CyberArk vs. OneLogin reviews, OneLogin has stronger overall reviews.
CyberArk vs. OneLogin both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Device Management, Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Third-Party Integrations, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, Supported Technologies. In our feature comparison of CyberArk vs. OneLogin, OneLogin offers more of the most popular features and tools than CyberArk.
In our pricing comparison of CyberArk vs. OneLogin, OneLogin's pricing starts at $4/month and is more affordable compared to OneLogin's starting cost of $4/month.
Our comparison of CyberArk vs. OneLogin shows that CyberArk scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements. OneLogin scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin, but CyberArk has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
