In our comparison of CrowdStrike Falcon vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
This system is solving a variety of problems for me, such as covering endpoint/cloud/threat/identity/security and observation with the help of AI and human expertise. This takes away a lot of the perceived oversight of security required by the business and allows us to concentrate on what we do best.
What I like best about Crowdstrike is how easy it is to deploy with the amazing help of their staff. Additionally, it has a very small footprint on resources, and the Falcon Dashboard is incredibly intuitive. The reports generated are of a standard that can be shared with the Exec team and is fully understood.
I cannot think of anything that I dislike about this product.
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
CrowdStrike is a trustworthy endpoint security solution that offers transparent security and first-rate support, giving users peace of mind. Even without a local interface, CrowdStrike is a great tool for safeguarding your most important information.
Good protection
Interfce that is not local
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
This system is solving a variety of problems for me, such as covering endpoint/cloud/threat/identity/security and observation with the help of AI and human expertise. This takes away a lot of the perceived oversight of security required by the business and allows us to concentrate on what we do best.
What I like best about Crowdstrike is how easy it is to deploy with the amazing help of their staff. Additionally, it has a very small footprint on resources, and the Falcon Dashboard is incredibly intuitive. The reports generated are of a standard that can be shared with the Exec team and is fully understood.
I cannot think of anything that I dislike about this product.
CrowdStrike is a trustworthy endpoint security solution that offers transparent security and first-rate support, giving users peace of mind. Even without a local interface, CrowdStrike is a great tool for safeguarding your most important information.
Good protection
Interfce that is not local
QRadar effectively addresses the need to monitor, investigate, detect, and respond to threats on devices and endpoints within the environment. Its logs retention capability is commendable, and it efficiently collates and analyzes large amounts of data from both cloud and on-site sources, providing valuable insights for security operations.
One of the best aspects of QRadar is its ability to assist in threat detection and response, providing a comprehensive solution for remediating threats. Its open architecture allows for deployment on various platforms, including on-premises, cloud, or as a service. The integration capabilities with EDR, SIEM, SOAR, and other threat intelligence tools enable a unified and comprehensive XDR approach.
There are a few areas that could be improved. The EPS cap, which limits the number of logs that can be integrated into QRadar, can sometimes result in generating false positives. Additionally, the user-friendliness of the platform could be enhanced, especially in terms of setting rules, which can be a bit challenging.
IBM QRadar serves as a valuable SIEM tool that enhances the portfolio of offerings, especially when used alongside MDR services. It provides valuable insights into the latest cyber threats and offers various log types for the monitoring team, benefiting the overall security and threat detection capabilities.
The integration of threat intelligence feeds with QRadar is outstanding, providing valuable and insightful information. Additionally, the graphical user interface (GUI) of the tool is impressive and well-designed, catering to the needs of analysts.
One drawback of QRadar is its high license cost, which can be expensive for organizations. Additionally, customization requests and configuring specific use cases incur additional charges. Another aspect that could be improved is the response time of the support team, as they tend to take longer to address queries or issues.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of CrowdStrike Falcon vs. QRadar SIEM, CrowdStrike Falcon has 8 user reviews and QRadar SIEM has 26. The average star rating for CrowdStrike Falcon is 4.25 while QRadar SIEM has an average rating of 4.15. CrowdStrike Falcon has more positive reviews than QRadar SIEM. Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon vs. QRadar SIEM reviews, CrowdStrike Falcon has stronger overall reviews.
CrowdStrike Falcon vs. QRadar SIEM both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Disaster Recovery, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Systems/Administrative, Configuration Management, Reminders/Alerts, Workflow Automation, Supported Technologies, Integration Options, After-Sales Service, Content Management. In our feature comparison of CrowdStrike Falcon vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM offers more of the most popular features and tools than CrowdStrike Falcon.
In our pricing comparison of CrowdStrike Falcon vs. QRadar SIEM, QRadar SIEM's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to QRadar SIEM's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of CrowdStrike Falcon vs. QRadar SIEM shows that CrowdStrike Falcon scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support. QRadar SIEM scores higher in meets requirements, quality of support, ease of admin, but CrowdStrike Falcon has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
