In our comparison of Coro vs. iboss, iboss is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Coro initially appeared to be the ideal option because of how simple it was to set up and use the management interface. But I soon found that its seeming simplicity belied a startling depth and intricacy. My issues were eventually resolved by the multi-layered strategy, although there was a higher learning curve than I had imagined.
Simple to setup, easy to use
None
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Coro is an excellent way to shield employees from phishing and other dangers as well as stop sensitive data from being shared or leaked without authorization. It offers visibility over what sensitive data is shared or departing the company and by whom, and it is simple to set up and operate. Nevertheless, there were some difficulties when using group policy to deploy the agent.
Easy to setup and use, intutive and visibility
Deploying agent through group policy was trouble
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Coro initially appeared to be the ideal option because of how simple it was to set up and use the management interface. But I soon found that its seeming simplicity belied a startling depth and intricacy. My issues were eventually resolved by the multi-layered strategy, although there was a higher learning curve than I had imagined.
Simple to setup, easy to use
None
Coro is an excellent way to shield employees from phishing and other dangers as well as stop sensitive data from being shared or leaked without authorization. It offers visibility over what sensitive data is shared or departing the company and by whom, and it is simple to set up and operate. Nevertheless, there were some difficulties when using group policy to deploy the agent.
Easy to setup and use, intutive and visibility
Deploying agent through group policy was trouble
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
The technical crew is really helpful, and the dashboard is simple to use and understand.
I would place iBoss' engineering goals and support on par with Microsoft Office 365 support in terms of quality. The entire system has unquestionably changed how we think about security and forward planning. The knowledge that is communicated so simply and with such clarity has truly enabled our team to concentrate solely on the requirements and preferences of our users rather than the details of the underlying programming. The one thing about iBoss that I don't like is how difficult it may be to put up the granular rules.
Easy to use, helpful technical support, and security control
Granular rules can be challenging to set up and video tutorials aren't enough
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Coro vs. iboss, Coro has 21 user reviews and iboss has 10. The average star rating for Coro is 4.66 while iboss has an average rating of 4.1. Coro has more positive reviews than iboss. Comparing Coro vs. iboss reviews, Coro has stronger overall reviews.
Coro vs. iboss both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Data Management, Systems/Administrative. In our feature comparison of Coro vs. iboss, iboss offers more of the most popular features and tools than Coro.
In our pricing comparison of Coro vs. iboss, iboss's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to iboss's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Coro vs. iboss shows that iboss scores higher in usability for ease of use, setup & support, quality of support, ease of admin. Coro scores higher in meets requirements, learning curve, but iboss has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
