In our comparison of Checkmarx One vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
A thorough tool for checking code for security flaws is called Checkmarx. Application code, source code, byte code, and binaries can all be analyzed with it. The Checkmarx dashboard offers a concise summary of the scan results along with patterns and data to help you monitor your development. Checkmarx has a drawback in that it occasionally experiences outages, which can cause code deployment to be delayed.
Comprehensive analysis, intuitive dashboard
Downtime impacts deployment
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
This security tool is excellent at identifying weaknesses in your code and strengthening its security. Additionally, it assigns a risk-based category to the vulnerabilities, which helps prioritize fixes. With each build, you can scan your code by simply integrating the tool with your continuous integration pipeline. But the user interface (UI) might be easier to use, particularly with the reports.
Identifies all security vulnerabilities, integrates with CI pipeline
UI is not good
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
A thorough tool for checking code for security flaws is called Checkmarx. Application code, source code, byte code, and binaries can all be analyzed with it. The Checkmarx dashboard offers a concise summary of the scan results along with patterns and data to help you monitor your development. Checkmarx has a drawback in that it occasionally experiences outages, which can cause code deployment to be delayed.
Comprehensive analysis, intuitive dashboard
Downtime impacts deployment
This security tool is excellent at identifying weaknesses in your code and strengthening its security. Additionally, it assigns a risk-based category to the vulnerabilities, which helps prioritize fixes. With each build, you can scan your code by simply integrating the tool with your continuous integration pipeline. But the user interface (UI) might be easier to use, particularly with the reports.
Identifies all security vulnerabilities, integrates with CI pipeline
UI is not good
Companies can access real-time security scores from Security Scorecard, which is routinely updated to reflect changes to their networks and apps. Customers that wish to initiate discussions about their security posture and buy additional services will find this useful. However, for new businesses, the first discovery phase can last up to 7 days, so a 24-hour-earlier report would be advantageous.
Real-time scoring from multiple sources and score is updated over time to track changes in security posture
Initial discovery can take up to 7 days for new companies, and 24-hour earlier reports would be a useful feature
Clear and concise security metrics are provided by this software, making it simple for senior management to understand and implement low-hanging security adjustments. Despite the possibility of some false positives as a result of shared cloud resources, the product offers a quick and efficient way to identify security issues and spur change.
Easy to understand, and allows you to push for security changes
False positives
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Checkmarx One vs. SecurityScorecard, Checkmarx One has 7 user reviews and SecurityScorecard has 18. The average star rating for Checkmarx One is 4.28 while SecurityScorecard has an average rating of 4.05. Checkmarx One has more positive reviews than SecurityScorecard. Comparing Checkmarx One vs. SecurityScorecard reviews, Checkmarx One has stronger overall reviews.
Checkmarx One vs. SecurityScorecard both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Risk Management, Cloud Management, Reminders/Alerts, Systems/Administrative, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Language & Speech, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Checkmarx One vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard offers more of the most popular features and tools than Checkmarx One.
In our pricing comparison of Checkmarx One vs. SecurityScorecard, SecurityScorecard's pricing starts at Free/month and is more affordable compared to SecurityScorecard's starting cost of Free/month.
Our comparison of Checkmarx One vs. SecurityScorecard shows that SecurityScorecard scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, setup & support, quality of support. Checkmarx One scores higher in ease of admin, but SecurityScorecard has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
