In our comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
Check Point excels with its quick setup, easy management tools, and lightning-fast performance. Additionally, the reports are simple. It's amazing how much their new Maestro technology pushes hardware efficiency. The expensive price is my sole complaint. However, Check Point is hard to surpass for seamless scalability and rock-solid stability.
Ease of deployment, friendly management and reporting GUI
High price
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
I was quite satisfied with Checkpoint's firewall because of its very simple setup wizard and informative security reports. Although these functions are standard, Checkpoint performs them incredibly effectively. Administrators are provided with a comprehensive overview of their network's security by the straightforward and comprehensive reports. However, there is room for improvement in the log storage capacity, particularly for SMB clients who want all-in-one solutions. More internal storage may be desired by some users, even though integration with external log servers is a benefit.
Simple Installation, centralized security
Limited Log Holding Capacity
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Check Point excels with its quick setup, easy management tools, and lightning-fast performance. Additionally, the reports are simple. It's amazing how much their new Maestro technology pushes hardware efficiency. The expensive price is my sole complaint. However, Check Point is hard to surpass for seamless scalability and rock-solid stability.
Ease of deployment, friendly management and reporting GUI
High price
I was quite satisfied with Checkpoint's firewall because of its very simple setup wizard and informative security reports. Although these functions are standard, Checkpoint performs them incredibly effectively. Administrators are provided with a comprehensive overview of their network's security by the straightforward and comprehensive reports. However, there is room for improvement in the log storage capacity, particularly for SMB clients who want all-in-one solutions. More internal storage may be desired by some users, even though integration with external log servers is a benefit.
Simple Installation, centralized security
Limited Log Holding Capacity
Perimeter 81 assists me in safeguarding the personal and sensitive information of my customers. As someone who deals with such data, this product helps me ensure its security and protection.
The best aspect of Perimeter 81, as experienced by my company, is its flawless performance and speed. So far, I haven't encountered any issues, and everything has been working efficiently. I have no negative feedback to share.
There are no complaints or dislikes to mention at this time. Everything has been functioning well.
The product solves the problem of remote access by providing a SaaS solution with dedicated access points and IP address allocations. This greatly benefits our organization by ensuring secure and reliable remote access for our team members.
One of the standout features is how quickly and seamlessly we were able to replace our remote access solution during our SOC2 Type II process. Within just 15 minutes, we connected our G-Suite for SSO, implemented access restrictions for our GCP instances, configured IP whitelisting for our main SaaS services, and invited our entire team. The user-friendly native agent has made it easy for both technical and non-technical teams to use without any issues. Additionally, having access points in the specific geo-locations we needed (Israel, EMEA, and US) has greatly improved performance.
There isn't much to dislike, especially after exploring other solutions. However, it would be nice to have additional dashboards, bandwidth tracking, and more granular traffic control within the Perimeter 81 network as our company grows.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 has 15 user reviews and Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) has 9. The average star rating for Perimeter 81 is 4.8 while Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) has an average rating of 4.33. Perimeter 81 has more positive reviews than Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW). Comparing Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. Perimeter 81 reviews, Perimeter 81 has stronger overall reviews.
Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. Perimeter 81 both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Reporting & Analytics, Device Management, Network Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Governance, Risk, & Compliance (GRC), Sync/Refresh, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81 offers more of the most popular features and tools than Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW).
In our pricing comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. Perimeter 81, Perimeter 81's pricing starts at $8/month and is more affordable compared to Perimeter 81's starting cost of $8/month.
Our comparison of Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) vs. Perimeter 81 shows that Perimeter 81 scores higher in usability for meets requirements, setup & support, quality of support. Check Point Next Generation Firewalls (NGFW) scores higher in ease of use, learning curve, ease of admin, but Perimeter 81 has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
