In our comparison of Celoxis vs. Workfront, Workfront is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
General Comments: The reporting feature is really something extraordinary. I would definitely recommend it.
It has one very precious and admirable feature, at least to me, that is the reporting. You can make a report out of pretty much anything that you track within the app, and then you have options to interact with the charts, filter the data, and change up the visualization.
It is a bit expensive. But can be called the cost-effective.
Extremely hard interaction and acquisition.
Has an amazing appearance, operating it is simple, and befitting functionality to our company.
Installing and operating it is hard, missing detailed resourcing practicality, and it is hard to know the product deciding the client’s trail.
Celoxis helps in managing budgets, projects, and is suitable for a medium-sized company.
It is helpful in planning, monitoring, and managing resources, and also controlling budget expenditures.
Celoxis is complicated for a small team. I use it for managing my 5 developers but I don't find it useful as I don't use most of its features.
Our exclusive PM software is Workfront. Using it, we handle internal projects, customer-facing, and submit new projects via it, and we do hour reporting every month.
Tagging internal task proprietors with notifications and queries is a vital ability, the ability to view if a project is on course for the timeline that is agreed upon in a customer-facing job, exporting hours at the end when we look back on resource reporting after submission and approval of projects via the software is done is possible thanks to the main functionalities, and the ability to see the development status of a project, the person responsible, and the problems that should be addressed if any during high level project management is great.
Failure to at times notice the action awaiting you if you have numerous projects in Workfront as the software has a very tiny Notifications button, a learning curve exists.
General Comments: The reporting feature is really something extraordinary. I would definitely recommend it.
It has one very precious and admirable feature, at least to me, that is the reporting. You can make a report out of pretty much anything that you track within the app, and then you have options to interact with the charts, filter the data, and change up the visualization.
It is a bit expensive. But can be called the cost-effective.
Celoxis helps in managing budgets, projects, and is suitable for a medium-sized company.
It is helpful in planning, monitoring, and managing resources, and also controlling budget expenditures.
Celoxis is complicated for a small team. I use it for managing my 5 developers but I don't find it useful as I don't use most of its features.
Extremely hard interaction and acquisition.
Has an amazing appearance, operating it is simple, and befitting functionality to our company.
Installing and operating it is hard, missing detailed resourcing practicality, and it is hard to know the product deciding the client’s trail.
Our exclusive PM software is Workfront. Using it, we handle internal projects, customer-facing, and submit new projects via it, and we do hour reporting every month.
Tagging internal task proprietors with notifications and queries is a vital ability, the ability to view if a project is on course for the timeline that is agreed upon in a customer-facing job, exporting hours at the end when we look back on resource reporting after submission and approval of projects via the software is done is possible thanks to the main functionalities, and the ability to see the development status of a project, the person responsible, and the problems that should be addressed if any during high level project management is great.
Failure to at times notice the action awaiting you if you have numerous projects in Workfront as the software has a very tiny Notifications button, a learning curve exists.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Celoxis vs. Workfront, Celoxis has 33 user reviews and Workfront has 178. The average star rating for Celoxis is 4.60 while Workfront has an average rating of 4.43. Celoxis has more positive reviews than Workfront. Comparing Celoxis vs. Workfront reviews, Celoxis has stronger overall reviews.
Celoxis vs. Workfront both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Project Management Features, Task Management, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Help Desk Features, Customizable Items, Portal Types, Collaboration Tools, File Management, Expense Management, Cash Flow Management, Layout Types, Reporting & Analytics, Language & Speech, Systems/Administrative, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Integration Options, Third-Party Integrations, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Deployment Options, After-Sales Service. In our feature comparison of Celoxis vs. Workfront, Celoxis offers more of the most popular features and tools than Workfront.
In our pricing comparison of Celoxis vs. Workfront, Workfront's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Workfront's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Celoxis vs. Workfront shows that Celoxis scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, ease of admin. Workfront scores higher in learning curve, setup & support, quality of support, but Celoxis has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
