Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker: Which is Best?

Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker: Which is Best?

Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker Best Overall: Carbon Black Endpoint

In our comparison of Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker, Carbon Black Endpoint is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.

Quick Info

Carbon Black Endpoint Quick Info
WH Score:
8.5
Pricing Score:
8.3
Feature Score:
8.8
Usability Score:
7.9
Company Size:Mid Market, Large Market
Platforms:
ThreatLocker Quick Info
WH Score:
7.9
Pricing Score:
7.1
Feature Score:
7.9
Usability Score:
7.1
Company Size:All Sizes
Platforms:

Pricing

Carbon Black Endpoint Pricing
Price Range
Contact Us

* Vendor does not share prices.

ThreatLocker Pricing
Price Range
Contact Us

* Vendor does not share prices.

Features

Carbon Black Endpoint Features
  • Network Security
  • Data Security
  • Cloud Security
  • Web Security
  • Email Security
  • Gateway Security
  • Server Security
  • Workload Security
  • Runtime Security
  • API Security
  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
  • Firewall
  • Encryption
  • Filtering
  • Attack Surface Monitoring
ThreatLocker Features
  • Network Security
  • Data Security
  • Cloud Security
  • Web Security
  • Email Security
  • Gateway Security
  • Server Security
  • Workload Security
  • Runtime Security
  • API Security
  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
  • Firewall
  • Encryption
  • Filtering
  • Attack Surface Monitoring

Pros & Cons

Carbon Black Endpoint Pros & Cons
Pros
  • Advanced threat detection capabilities, real-time response capabilities, easy to deploy and manage and intuitive interface.
Cons
  • Many false positives.
ThreatLocker Pros & Cons
Pros
    Cons

      Reviews

      Carbon Black Endpoint Reviews
      Top Favorable Review
      W
      Wayne
      Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

      Strong endpoint protection with real-time threat detection and outstanding core features is Carbon Black Endpoint. Its sophisticated features, however, can be difficult to handle, which makes it less appropriate for inexperienced IT teams. Its high cost and resource-intensiveness could also be a problem for smaller businesses and outdated systems.

      Advanced threat detection capabilities, real-time response capabilities, easy to deploy and manage and intuitive interface

      High pricing and difficult to configure and manage advanced features for less experienced IT teams

      Top Critical Review
      R
      Roberta
      Reviewed on Jul 2, 2021

      Carbon Black offers enhanced defense against zero-day attacks for servers and workstations that are crucial to company operations. Through the internet portal, it is simple to install, administer, and troubleshoot by placing it in bypass mode. But because Carbon Black is predictive, it can block a lot of legitimate processes, especially when it's newly installed and getting to know your environment.

      Easy to install and manage, good protection against zero-day threats and can be easily placed in bypass mode

      Many false positives

      ThreatLocker Reviews
      Top Favorable Review

      N/A

      Top Critical Review

      N/A

      Alternatives

      Carbon Black Endpoint Alternatives
      8.6
      8.4
      ThreatLocker Alternatives
      8.6
      8.4
      Add to Compare

      Add suggested to comparison

      Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker: Detailed Comparison

      Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker Top Ratings & Reviews: Carbon Black Endpoint

      In our rating and review comparison of Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker, Carbon Black Endpoint has 3 user reviews and ThreatLocker has 0. The average star rating for Carbon Black Endpoint is 5 while ThreatLocker has an average rating of 0.0. Carbon Black Endpoint has more positive reviews than ThreatLocker. Comparing Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker reviews, Carbon Black Endpoint has stronger overall reviews.

      Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker Best Features & Functionality: Carbon Black Endpoint

      Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Device Management, Network Management, Application Management, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Password Management, Reporting & Analytics, Cybersecurity Protection Types, Systems/Administrative, Sync/Refresh, Workflow Automation, Integration Options, After-Sales Service, Disaster Recovery, Content Management, Data Management, Reminders/Alerts. In our feature comparison of Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker, Carbon Black Endpoint offers more of the most popular features and tools than ThreatLocker.

      Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker Best Pricing: ThreatLocker

      In our pricing comparison of Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker, ThreatLocker's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to ThreatLocker's starting cost of N/A/month.

      Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker Best Usability: Carbon Black Endpoint

      Our comparison of Carbon Black Endpoint vs. ThreatLocker shows that Carbon Black Endpoint scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, learning curve, ease of admin. ThreatLocker scores higher in , but Carbon Black Endpoint has the best scores overall for system usability.

      The right software for your business

      Get your personalized recommendations now.