In our comparison of Acunetix vs. Menlo Security, Acunetix is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
* Vendor does not share prices.
* Vendor does not share prices.
We utilize Acunetix to conduct periodic scans of our product, ensuring that any new features added are scanned before their public release. The main benefit for us is the quick turnaround time for security scans, with the ability to receive a comprehensive Developers report. Additionally, the flexibility to generate reports in other formats, such as OWASP, proves valuable for our security team and business needs.
The best feature of Acunetix OVS is its ability to scan our product for vulnerabilities with every release. Setting up the scan and generating reports for developers is easy, providing them with a clear description of the identified vulnerabilities along with test cases. Additionally, running the tests and receiving the report within a few hours allows for quick iterations and rechecking of security after developers have addressed the issues.
Occasionally, the scan duration can be lengthy, prompting us to run it overnight. However, this is not a significant issue for us as it aligns with our infrastructure's optimization strategy, avoiding stress on it during working hours.
N/A
The product offers a quick and effective solution for rapidly testing websites for vulnerabilities. This saves time and allows for prompt identification and mitigation of security risks. Additionally, the availability of an API adds further convenience and flexibility for integrating the solution into existing workflows.
I appreciate that the product offers rapid scanning of websites with constantly updated vulnerability checks. It is particularly focused on platform-specific vulnerabilities, such as AEM-specific vulnerabilities. This ensures thorough scanning and protection.
The target license model can be a bit cumbersome. There are issues with deleting targets within a certain time frame and targets carrying over from previous years, which count against your total. It would be better if the target count could be reset and if there was an option to selectively count previous year's targets within a subsequent year.
N/A
We utilize Acunetix to conduct periodic scans of our product, ensuring that any new features added are scanned before their public release. The main benefit for us is the quick turnaround time for security scans, with the ability to receive a comprehensive Developers report. Additionally, the flexibility to generate reports in other formats, such as OWASP, proves valuable for our security team and business needs.
The best feature of Acunetix OVS is its ability to scan our product for vulnerabilities with every release. Setting up the scan and generating reports for developers is easy, providing them with a clear description of the identified vulnerabilities along with test cases. Additionally, running the tests and receiving the report within a few hours allows for quick iterations and rechecking of security after developers have addressed the issues.
Occasionally, the scan duration can be lengthy, prompting us to run it overnight. However, this is not a significant issue for us as it aligns with our infrastructure's optimization strategy, avoiding stress on it during working hours.
The product offers a quick and effective solution for rapidly testing websites for vulnerabilities. This saves time and allows for prompt identification and mitigation of security risks. Additionally, the availability of an API adds further convenience and flexibility for integrating the solution into existing workflows.
I appreciate that the product offers rapid scanning of websites with constantly updated vulnerability checks. It is particularly focused on platform-specific vulnerabilities, such as AEM-specific vulnerabilities. This ensures thorough scanning and protection.
The target license model can be a bit cumbersome. There are issues with deleting targets within a certain time frame and targets carrying over from previous years, which count against your total. It would be better if the target count could be reset and if there was an option to selectively count previous year's targets within a subsequent year.
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Acunetix vs. Menlo Security, Acunetix has 19 user reviews and Menlo Security has 0. The average star rating for Acunetix is 4.36 while Menlo Security has an average rating of 0.0. Acunetix has more positive reviews than Menlo Security. Comparing Acunetix vs. Menlo Security reviews, Acunetix has stronger overall reviews.
Acunetix vs. Menlo Security both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Cybersecurity Features, Reporting & Analytics, Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity Protection Types, Application Management, Systems/Administrative, Network Management, Device Management, Customizable Items, Third-Party Integrations, Compliance Accreditations, Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Integrations, Reminders/Alerts, Drag-and-Drop Builders/Designers, After-Sales Service, Limits. In our feature comparison of Acunetix vs. Menlo Security, Acunetix offers more of the most popular features and tools than Menlo Security.
In our pricing comparison of Acunetix vs. Menlo Security, Menlo Security's pricing starts at N/A/month and is more affordable compared to Menlo Security's starting cost of N/A/month.
Our comparison of Acunetix vs. Menlo Security shows that Acunetix scores higher in usability for ease of use, meets requirements, setup & support, ease of admin. Menlo Security scores higher in , but Acunetix has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
