In our comparison of Act-On vs. Campaign Monitor, Act-On is the best option with a higher overall Wheelhouse Score. Wheelhouse Score uses a combination of feature and pricing comparison data, average user ratings, and editorial reviews to score software vendors on a scale of 1-10.
It allows me to be in contact with my prospects. I love this tool and recommend it to all!
It has a timeline that helps me a lot in completing my projects on time. It keeps me and my team organized. It literally has determined the future of marketing automation.
There are some issues we are constructively facing within the program. They should inform us at least before performing any change or update.
I can gather consumer information and send incredibly targeted emails with Campaign Monitor's segmentation and personalization tools, which effectively engages our audience. Although it was first difficult, we were able to integrate with several on-premise pre-built apps with the assistance of third-party service providers.
Segmentation and personalization
Integrating with some on-premise pre-built apps can be challenging.
It is a stunning platform for marketing automation.
An easy-to-use tool that can be taught easily too.
It is a little problematic regarding its layout. The buttons are not attractive.
A user-friendly email marketing tool like this makes it easy and speedy to create customized emails, automate responses, and deliver campaigns that are suitable for mobile devices.
Personalization, auto email responses and mobile templates
None
It allows me to be in contact with my prospects. I love this tool and recommend it to all!
It has a timeline that helps me a lot in completing my projects on time. It keeps me and my team organized. It literally has determined the future of marketing automation.
There are some issues we are constructively facing within the program. They should inform us at least before performing any change or update.
It is a stunning platform for marketing automation.
An easy-to-use tool that can be taught easily too.
It is a little problematic regarding its layout. The buttons are not attractive.
I can gather consumer information and send incredibly targeted emails with Campaign Monitor's segmentation and personalization tools, which effectively engages our audience. Although it was first difficult, we were able to integrate with several on-premise pre-built apps with the assistance of third-party service providers.
Segmentation and personalization
Integrating with some on-premise pre-built apps can be challenging.
A user-friendly email marketing tool like this makes it easy and speedy to create customized emails, automate responses, and deliver campaigns that are suitable for mobile devices.
Personalization, auto email responses and mobile templates
None
Add suggested to comparison
In our rating and review comparison of Act-On vs. Campaign Monitor, Act-On has 63 user reviews and Campaign Monitor has 16. The average star rating for Act-On is 4.36 while Campaign Monitor has an average rating of 4.06. Act-On has more positive reviews than Campaign Monitor. Comparing Act-On vs. Campaign Monitor reviews, Act-On has stronger overall reviews.
Act-On vs. Campaign Monitor both offer a strong set of features and functionality including Reporting & Analytics, Campaign Management, Lead Management, Supported Channels, Customizable Items, Integration Options, Campaign Types. In our feature comparison of Act-On vs. Campaign Monitor, Act-On offers more of the most popular features and tools than Campaign Monitor.
In our pricing comparison of Act-On vs. Campaign Monitor, Campaign Monitor's pricing starts at $9/month and is more affordable compared to Act-On's starting cost of $1100/month.
Our comparison of Act-On vs. Campaign Monitor shows that Act-On scores higher in usability for ease of use, learning curve, quality of support, ease of admin. Campaign Monitor scores higher in meets requirements, setup & support, but Act-On has the best scores overall for system usability.
Get your personalized recommendations now.
